Former MP John Hemming
Former Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming has won outright a judicial review against the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Hemming obtained permission in a judgement of 18 November 2022, arising from a hearing where he represented himself and was accompanied by his partner Emily and also your author. That judgement is now up on BAILII. After permission was granted, the IOPC has conceded outright.
The two points on which Hemming has now prevailed are on the IOPC’s failure to deal with his complaints about a police conduct investigation as follows –
“a. As set out in his letter dated 6 October 2021, that email exchanges between DI Thomas and an officer of the 2nd Interested Party on 15 May 2020 gave rise to an appearance of bias.
b. As set out in his letters dated 22 August and 6 October 2021, that DI Thomas had known that DCS Oomer’s stated reasons (1) and (2) (recorded in his policy book on 1 March 2019) for categorising , once opened, the 2nd Interested Party’s investigation into EB [Esther Baker] (attempting to pervert the course of justice) as low priority were false and that DCS Oomer was aware that they were false.”
The IOPC has also agreed to pay Hemming’s costs. A copy of the relevant parts of the consent order is below –
The consent order in the Hemming Judicial Review of the IOPC.
Congratulations to all! This is a monumental win!
Tremendous shame this blog is so ‘obscure and only read by a handful of people’. This means not many people will find about this win. Unfashionable to mention this blog. Risk of being ostracised, and accused of being a shill.
Although it is possible someone somehow manages to land here by fluke again, and forwards copies to people who refuse to read it here in the raw. Due to some belief that this site is rigged to collect all their personal data, and will immediately send out a drone to check if they have pegged their washing out correctly, or to rain deathly chemicals down on them. Or whatever else it is they think will happen to them if they end up reading the news on this ‘boring’ blog.
All police who colluded with, or who had involvements with the ‘paedo hunter’ hoaxsters should note every word of the bailii link below. Some police working in other areas of the UK, will find this is rather like looking in a mirror. Other police should see a colleague’s reflection. Some may see large groups of bent police colleagues staring back at them.
On a lighter note, whilst we know some police have been shafted by ‘paedo hunter’ hoaxsters and immediate colleagues, other police have been shafted not only by ‘paedo hunter’ hoaxsters and immediate colleagues, but also by police whom they have never met and do not know. Due to them all ‘policing’ different counties and countries. Each with their own individual methods of taking crime reports, whilst discussing innocent people and victims of serious crimes as if they are dirt.
See Wayne Couzens and colleagues’ whatapps for a glimpse into how police chatted to each other about innocent people during the police ‘investigations’ into the ‘paedo hunt’. Triple it. Multiply it by 10. It still won’t come close to the behaviour found in some police.
đżđżđż
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2022/3307.html
Initially I had no idea who had the right of it and who didn’t in this case. Within the background reading I did I became aware that Mr Hemming didn’t have the mark on his back that the ‘other side’ had alleged. I might not agree with Mr Hemming on all things.
Rory, your point about rogue police officers is valid; the only thing I hope is that it doesn’t provide ammunition for the likes of one Mr J Wedger who has accused the police of wrongdoing in the past. I still like to hope that there are more decent police officers than malicious ones.
Somebody online accused me of being a pea dough file enabler (my crime was saying that I thought the Hampstead hoax was indeed a hoax). My accuser did change her tune when I mentioned that I’d had an unpleasant experience when I was a child. Nothing happened because some people – and a dog – came along and frightened off the would-be perpetrator. So I am reasonably fortunate because there are lots of kids who don’t have anybody frighten off the bad lots.
Congratulations to John, Emily and Sam. Well deserved victory.
Have wondered about the logic of making an investigation into alleged false allegations of a very serious nature “low priority” regardless of resource issues as it allowed time for possible evidence destruction etc. The swift moves by Cumbria Police in the Ellie Williams case demonstrated the need for securing evidence as soon as possible in order to build a solid case. Staffordshire Police have a lot of questions to answer, in my opinion, in that regard alone. Not least because it allowed Baker to make other false allegations elsewhere resulting in other harm to innocent individuals.
I’ll also be expecting the police to take a long hard look at the collusion between Baker and some obvious third parties who not only took an interest in her behaviour but actively encouraged it.
Staffordshire SHOULD (and the IOPC could still order it [as they should]) have got an external force to investigate PCJ against Baker – as the Met did with Beech. In my view, they are far too close to the case to make impartial decisions and Gwent have demonstrated they can’t be trusted either.
Absolutely. One of the points we made about the outrageous behaviour of Javid Oomer, is that he was on notice Baker had continued in problematic behaviour as set out in the judgement.
She was also continuing whilst she was claiming to be a “victim” too, there is a distinct period of time where her collusion with others was very clearly (my opinion) designed to bolster her claims to Staffordshire. Staffs should’ve and still could look at that wider conduct. Unfortunately, their decision making to date seems at best suspect and at worst down right worrying.
Baker’s rants about the Chief Constable identity are a red herring too, she seems to have forgotten her collusion with Sharon Evans, Mark Watts and [Redacted by MHN] on that particular allegation. The timing of those allegations becoming public was immediately before the NFA decisions were made public re John and others. That timing in August 2017 is crucial to understanding the wider conspiratorial and collusion elements that I believe exist.
It seems rather odd that the CPS has been dithering over a decision on whether to prosecute Esther Baker for PCJ for nearly four years?
Suffice to say that as you can see from the judgement, we feel some police were mostly motivated by a desire to not have any scrutiny of their investigation into Baker’s allegations, which by any measure squandered vast sums of public money, time and resources as well as turning upside down the lives of many innocent people. The CPS have been waiting on certain police actions. I am not going to say what those actions were, to avoid interfering with the investigation.
Samuel Collingwood Smith
on January 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
“some police were mostly motivated by a desire to not have any scrutiny of their investigation into Bakerâs allegations, which by any measure squandered vast sums of public money, time and resources as well as turning upside down the lives of many innocent people…”
Couldn’t agree more. Sums it up.
It being known that police were already informed by observers and victims alike, that police were being given the run around by ‘VIP paedo hunters’ before Esther Baker became a full time poster girl and opened the flood gates.
Today, we have police who don’t like to be filmed beating people up and kicking doors in and whatnot, because they may be later immortalised as a thug on youtube etc. However, it is known that during the past decade, police were found to be chomping at the bit to be a part of the biggest witch hunt known to man/insert own pronoun. In hope of receiving possible realm and tv accolades, and getting bit parts in fillums about ‘paedo protectors’ and ‘stalkers.
What all police need to do now, is conjure up better excuses than in the link below. Because this was even more pathetic than a patient telling a doctor that the King Edward slipped up their bottom when they fell into the veg rack.
We see you… đ
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ted-heath-sex-abuse-operation-conifer-mike-veale-phone-smashed-golf-iopc-investigation-a8541126.html
The police and CPS are behaving similarly in all cases where liars and fantasists involved in the ‘VIP paedo hunt’ have wreaked havoc and threatened the lives and livelihoods of innocent people. The majority of the cases being much older than four years. It being presumed police have dragged their feet because they do not know where to start. They are not only at risk of exposing where they have failed, but also where other police have failed. Badly. Up and down the UK. Nowhere was safe from ‘paedo hunters’, or from the police involved with them. There was a lot of tunnel vision. By design. An increasingly large ‘VIP paedo hunter’ gang were contacting police morning, noon and night to make false allegations about their prey. Rendering lazy police stupid enough to think that if they were receiving numerous calls about the same targets, it must mean the false allegations were true. And police will never pass up an excuse to dress up in their anti-terrorist outfits and do a dawn raid. It’s an adrenalin thing. Shakes the cobwebs off. Anticipating what will be lying in wait for them. Talking about it back at the nick. Colleagues slapping them on the back for kicking doors in and forcing old ladies and school kids out of bed.
Had police in all areas of the UK not allowed the sh*t to pile so high, and spread it so far and wide, they would not be in such a predicament. There is barely a cop shop in the UK which has not been connected in some way to every other cop shop in the UK because of liars and fantasists giving police the run around.
The police know it. We know it. The police know we know they know it.
đżđżđż
Some police dealing with Esther Baker’s numerous fictitious complaints appear to be behaving in the same way as the police dealing with all the genuine complaints made against her. Further asserting the belief all UK police have been working to the same unwritten rules throughout the ‘VIP paedo hunt’. Which by all accounts, involves police completely immersing themselves in every pile of sh*t delivered to them by said ‘VIP paedo hunters’. Swallowing as much as possible themselves. Then sending the left-overs in doggie bags for their colleagues in distant counties to roll around in. Thus encouraging lazy, bent, malicious police to put their feet up and play games of Chinese Whispers about completely innocent people for the past ten years. Resulting in police making highly defamatory comments about the true victims of heinous crimes, and behaving in an extremely dangerous manner guaranteed to cause as much harm to their prey and their families as the ‘VIP paedo hunters’ had already caused them.
Biographies about people with the most criminally evil minds can be quite tame reading when compared to yer average cop talking behind the backs of not only criminals, but entirely innocent members of the public. ie. People whom they do not know, and have only the words of fantasists and liars to rely on. Dehumanising is not quite a strong enough word for how police have treated all innocent parties in the ‘paedo hunt’. They truly are an absolute disgrace to policing. They won’t get away with blaming any of their behaviour on a ‘lack of training’. Only being deaf, blind or illiterate could be used in defence.
All the while police were gossiping amongst themselves and with ‘paedo hunters’, people were left at risk of ongoing physical threats to life and limb; risk of arrest; PINs; police interviews; ‘police interviews’, and imprisonment. This despite police being warned in advance of when ‘paedo hunters’ would be contacting them to make fresh false allegations against their targets.
Numerous police involved in the manufactured ‘crime of the century VIP ‘paedo hunt’ have already proven themselves to be unable to do their job without fear or favour. It will come as no surprise to find out more police have been falling foul of their oath, and not doing a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay. There seems to have been an awful lot of this in the ‘paedo hunt’. ie. Bent, lazy, bone idle, vindictive, violent, malicious police behaving like sheep and not thinking for themselves. Throwing themselves head first into a ‘story’ generated and disseminated to create mistrust of authorities, ‘authorities’ and to bring about more political instability.
Dozens and dozens of police were in full knowledge that their colleagues were already on a runaway train. That they chose to jump aboard with them, is subject to reviews.
An informative letter written by police early 2016 in response to complaints about Esther Baker and others involved in the ‘paedo hunt’, provides proof of a large number of police choosing to not only allow, aid and abet ‘paedo hunters’ in their harassment, stalking, false allegations, and threats to life and limb etc, but to also collude with the ‘paedo hunters’ in defaming, harassing, stalking, threatening, and carrying out threats to their prey. Said letter confirming most of which police had stated categorically in 2015. Which was, that men falsely accused of paedophilia, should be left to deal with it themselves; that no evidence of conspiracy and joint enterprise was required to prevent and defend the falsely accused; that police were not taking any preventative action against ‘paedo hunters’; that matters concerning the ‘paedo hunters’ were to run their course. Which is why Carl Beech is in prison, and Esther Baker is where she is today. In a limbo not all of her own making. Her cohorts having abandoned her as quickly as they abandoned Carl Beech when he could no longer serve the purpose of falsely accusing people of paedophilia, raising awareness of child abuse, or appealing for funds to help ‘journalists’ rescue children and infants from being abused and rented out to the highest bidding VIPs in the dungeons of Parliament. (How much was an Exaro subscription back in the day?)
We have not heard of any children being rescued from Parliament or from the Family Court syndicates during the last ten years. Therefore it must be presumed children are still being held captive. Waiting to be rescued. They have had a long wait. Some must be in their 20s now. Who pays for their food and lodging?
Tragic. Esther Baker. Seems barely five minutes since she and Carl Beech were holding court and keeping thousands of people entertained during the early hours gmt. Always around to hand out advice to victims of rape and child abuse. Passing on false and skewed personal information about scars, birthmarks, fetishes and whatnot. Falsely alleging they had suffered horrific abuse at the hands of Parliamentary paedophile gangs during childhood. Regularly repeating their fabricated histories ‘to help bring more victims forward’. The genuine and false abuse stories of the people who ‘came forward’ were added to their own elastic lists of false allegations. Presumably to keep their followers from becoming bored with stories about Esther Baker being chauffeured to Dolphin Square and strapped into a dentist chair, and Carl Beech being threatened with mutilation of his genitals. Not to mention all the guff stuff about poppies and wasps. Ffs. That moment when Beech said he thought he saw Esther Baker at Dolphin Square. lol (Their age difference for a start.)
Their recruitment of abused people was helped by ‘journalists’ already alleging to hold lists and ‘proof’ of not dozens, but hundreds of VIP and household names who have abused and tortured children for decades. Allegedly still doing so. By all accounts. So keep your kids close. Always know where they are. If you work nights, facetime your kids every couple of hours. For your own peace of mind. So you know they won’t wake up one morning in thirty years time, and tell you that whilst you were working nights, they were regularly forced into a limousine by dark, shadowy figures, and driven to Dolphin Square to be abused by VIPs. (Do note police pretended to believe this sh*t.)
It being decided police could only have pretended to believe this, because they enjoyed the luxury of parking their backsides up in a pleasant and controlled environment, where tea and coffee was instantly available. Which in this one instance, appears to have kept personal expense accounts down. Other police being found to have quite extravagant taste when they aren’t tpaying for their own food and drink.
 Â
Whilst Esther Baker and Carl Beech’s stories of child abuse were being aired across msm and social media, all new followers and recruits were given protected data, false personal information and told who to block/unfollow and how to cause ‘pile-ons’ to have people suspended from social media if they objected to the paedophile gang rape narratives, or exposed their violence and threats to kill and maim etc. Which is perverting the course of justice etc. ie. Prime evidence was removed from sight of police. Leaving targets and victims to provide archives to cps for context. Due to police deliberately failing to pass information on in the first instance, and also due to police hiding it from cps after receiving it from their own and other sources.Â
Simultaneous acts of pcj being found where ‘paedo hunters’ were making synchronised false allegations to police. Which led to cautions, police threats, PINS, police threats, ‘interviews’, police threats, bent warrants, dawn raids, false arrests, arrests, police threats, threatening letters from the police, false charges, police threats, pre trial hearings, police threats, trials, more police threats.
Leaving barrels upon barrels of sh*t piled high on the pnc which the falsely accused have to have removed from police records. Which should free up a lot of space on the pnc for the victims’ own genuine complaints to police regarding threats to kill and maim, threats to property, malicious communications, stalking, harassment etc, as more complaints are reviewed and dealt with.
Esther Baker was clearly in distress and howling into twitter a few nights ago. Nobody came. Not even a cat meme was sent from @craftymuvva. All those who goaded her into becoming more and more outrageous over the years, appear to have been tucked up in bed. Or ignoring her. Surely not. Not after all she has done for them…Â
Without bothering to comment on the police in this instance, due to it being known all other police involved with the ‘paedo hunter’ gang have already proven they do not know their ar*e from their elbow, it is quite clear that an independent investigation is needed into why Esther Baker, Carl Beech, and the rest of the ‘paedo hunters’ were allowed and assisted by police in going as far as they did.
Most police and victims already know the answer to this. It rather looks as if the police in the original post also know the answer. Where to start is the problem. Where to f*cking start indeed…  đż
Esther Baker
@Esther9982
Oh. And now Iâm fucking furious!!!! Is anyone that knows me awake???
2:55 AM · Jan 17, 2023
This police chief may appear to have set the bar rather high for all the other ‘VIP paedo hunter’ police who want to express their inner comedian. He hasn’t won yet. There has been some tough competition…
‘A police chief has been reprimanded after smashing his work phone with a golf club âafter playing a poor shotâ â and then claiming it had been run over.
Chief Constable Mike Veale, who leads Cleveland Police, was investigated for potential misconduct and for providing an inaccurate account of the incident, during a controversial investigation of Sir Edward Heath.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said that on 23 September 2017, Mr Veale told colleagues his work phone âhad been dropped in a golf club car park and inadvertently run over by a vehicleâ.’
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ted-heath-sex-abuse-operation-conifer-mike-veale-phone-smashed-golf-iopc-investigation-a8541126.html
Not forgetting the old “anyone who challenges Exaro News must be a paedophile” guff from supporters of Beech, Baker etc. So basically anyone who saw through the shenanigans, questioned the methods and motives of Beech etc and their journalist handlers were instantly labelled.
Also not forgetting Mark Watts’ utter stupidity inventing claims about Ted Heath and a boy in a boat [who turned out to be Heath’s godson and is still alive to testify against Watts’ guff] and Watts getting his butt kicked by IMPRESS.
And who could possibly forget this one: Watts publishing tweets that people attacking Exaro News were “spooks”, “paedophiles” and other insults designed to cause massive divisions and spread hate.
Let’s also not forget the serial connections to a particular political party throughout this whole farce. Exaro News… Labour Party, Baker… Labour Party, Lantern… Labour Party, Sharon Evans… Labour Party [she even had Tony Blair’s daughter working for her at one point!] and that’s before we even start to look at the more recent crap of Maggie Oliver, Jon Wedger, Ellie Williams’ mother and others involved in false allegations.
It has always struck me that that there is a major political angle in this. John Hemming was succeeded by? Labour Party’s Jess Phillips. In the lead up to the 2015 Election, Hemming was being dragged through the mud by some of the above named players. It was all for a reason… a reason bigger than his constituency though imho.
If you look at all of the child grooming cases that have been brought to court, almost all of them have been in areas of the country where [at the time of the offences] the Labour Party had local control i.e. member of parliament was Labour or local Labour controlled councils.
What better way to deflect from their own failings in protecting children from harm than to generate a mass moral panic though?
Dirty tricks campaigns don’t come any worse than false allegations of paedophilia.
Also have to remember that at the time of the hustings in 2015, the country was still being run by a coalition between the Tories and the Lib Dems. Anyone who had a history of indiscretion was targeted… think about it in a bigger way than just the immediate victims of police raids and in a way that makes much more sense.
The involvement of Tom Watson right at the start of the Beech fiasco speaks volumes for the specific agenda in play which was to remove the Tory party [in particular] from government – not that I like the Tory party [sorry Sam] in general – but there was a very clear agenda, albeit not immediately obvious perhaps by certain elements on the Labour Party side.
Throw enough mud and some will inevitably stick, through enough sh!t at the fan and inevitably others in the room will get covered in it too. Those were the sick tactics involved – it’s now time to get to the players involved, not those who ended up innocently covered in the brown sh!t from the fan but those who threw the sh!t in the first place and especially those who delivered the sh!t to be thrown.
Only then will the true levels of incompetence, complicit behaviour and scheming be ultimately revealed. One only has to look at the timing of specific events and in relation to other events to see the knock on effects and the reasons why false allegations were thrown around.
It’s long overdue and only when that happens will some people realise exactly what they got themselves involved with. Fortunately, some individuals saw through the whole “game” and highlighted the behaviour when it was happening and also paid a heavy personal price for doing so, indeed some are no longer alive as a result of the stress of backlashes. They have, however, been vindicated, perhaps not totally yet, but they have been vindicated in their stances against the false accusers. It is a great pity therefore that the police, instead of being inept and unprofessional, didn’t listen more at the time when these issues were highlighted to them – unfortunately because they didn’t they are now feeling the pressure. It always boils down to choices, some appear at times to be seemingly irrelevant but they always have some consequences.
Truth conquers all.
SvT on January 22, 2023 at 12:33 pm:
“Staffordshire SHOULD (and the IOPC could still order it [as they should]) have got an external force to investigate PCJ against Baker â as the Met did with Beech. In my view, they are far too close to the case to make impartial decisions and Gwent have demonstrated they canât be trusted either.”
Gwent police have a chance to fare well in a current case involving ‘vip paedo hunters’, threats to life and limb, stalking, harassing, malicious communications, blackmail etc. If Gwent police fail to pull a dozen threads together, and assist in saving hundreds more hours of police time from being wasted, they definitely should not be trusted.
đżđżđż
Agree with every word of this:
https://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=9329#comment-24464
I contacted Operation Midland as a victim of historic abuse and soon wished I never had! The name of my abuser was changed by police in statements four times (to that of poor Harvey Proctor) and I withdrew from the inquiry as it was clearly fixed. I had to phone his solicitor ( a letter to him from police had been copied to me) to inform him I had refused to sign these statements and that his client was being set up! It was a case of police undermining victim credibility with false claims. The names of alleged abusers who were too important such as members of the royal family were never publicised. Just the small fry. Wheeling out the usual suspects to divert attention away from others and undermine true victims.
Me @ January 26, 2023 at 5:05 pm:
“Gwent police have a chance to fare well in a current case involving âvip paedo huntersâ, threats to life and limb, stalking, harassing, malicious communications, blackmail etc. If Gwent police fail to pull a dozen threads together, and assist in saving hundreds more hours of police time from being wasted, they definitely should not be trusted.”
Who knew before the end of last year that Gwent police could be so fearsome? That only the sight or sound of their name was enough to put the frighteners on people?
If people did not threaten the lives and livelihoods of innocent people, Gwent police would not have to get on their case. Stalking, harassment and malicious communications are illegal. Setting fire to living people in the UK is also illegal. It is almost universally accepted that it is only legal to burn people in the UK when they are already dead.
Threatening death, and causing the death of innocents with guns is also illegal. Unless police do it. Which is only barely legal, and generally only allowed when there is no cctv or members of the public filming police when they are midst killing people. This does not happen very often. But more often than we would expect or should allow.
If people did not make threats to lives and livelihoods, it would free up police time to rehearse their dances for Tik Tok, or have a catch-up with colleagues on Whatsapp. Well, perhaps not Whatsapp chats anymore. Not since Wayne Couzens and his colleagues vile messages were retrieved…
SvT on January 26, 2023 at 7:43 am:
“Itâs long overdue and only when that happens will some people realise exactly what they got themselves involved with. Fortunately, some individuals saw through the whole âgameâ and highlighted the behaviour when it was happening and also paid a heavy personal price for doing so, indeed some are no longer alive as a result of the stress of backlashes. They have, however, been vindicated, perhaps not totally yet, but they have been vindicated in their stances against the false accusers. It is a great pity therefore that the police, instead of being inept and unprofessional, didnât listen more at the time when these issues were highlighted to them â unfortunately because they didnât they are now feeling the pressure. It always boils down to choices, some appear at times to be seemingly irrelevant but they always have some consequences.
Truth conquers all.”
Due to knowing from the outset that they were being duped by ‘journalists’, police have been reluctant or outright refusing to go all the way back to the very beginning of the ‘VIP paedophiles’ hoaxes. Which was a time before we saw Carl Beech and Esther Baker brought to prominence. A time before ‘Ash’ was coerced by Bill Maloney for a BBC programme. A time before the monumental f*ck up by police on the Messham case. A time before ‘Team Outlaw’ was seen to be threatening, and carrying out their threats, and doxxing and destroying every single person who knew that their ‘VIP paedo hunt’ was part of a most elaborate hoax.
Make no mistake, police were fully aware of the ‘lists’ of vulnerable and disenfranchised fantasists and liars being distributed amongst journalists and counsellors.
Police ignored every warning that ‘VIP paedophile hunters’ should be thoroughly investigated before proceeding to act upon every lie that was told to them by some of the most dangerous people to have ever used social media.
Resulting in lives lost, devastated or left wrecked. Police left looking more stupid and dangerous than ever before. Proving there are more bent police per square mile than anyone could imagine. Costing the UK tens of millions of pounds, and still counting.
This snippet from one of the links below, gives a glimpse into the devastation caused by ‘VIP paedophile hunters’. The link to the Jillings Report is a whole other story of its own. About which, more will be spoken in time to come.
“The former Tory cabinet minister John Gummer, now Lord Deben, a friend of Brittanâs, said the police were wrong to allow the former home secretaryâs name to become public.
He said: âChild abuse is just about the most terrible thing you can be accused of, and it did affect him. Although the police knew that one of the allegations was entirely untrue and they were not going to proceed on it, they didnât tell him [Brittain] for five or six months while he was dying, so he never knew.â
Metropolitan police commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe:
Westminster paedophile ring inquiry ‘not a shambles’, says police chief
âThis is symbolic of whatâs happened all the way along the line,â Gummer added, citing the police naming the former prime minister Edward Heath in connection with child abuse allegations. Gummer said serious allegations should be dealt with âtoughlyâ but in private, until the police have sufficient grounds to make the allegations âa real possibilityâ.
He said: âWhen we look at the evidence that the police acted on publicly … and see how thin a great deal of it was and how much of it has evaporated you really do have to ask what the police were doing not following it up privately first before they had the scintilla of a case.â
Gummer recounted the vitriol he received when he defended Brittan. âOn my Twitter feed I had filth of a kind that was indescribable â from people who knew nothing about the case, all of whom believed what was said and all of whom accused me of being involved in some way because Iâd spoken out as a friend of Leonâs.â
Bailey insisted that the police had not been too credulous in their response to child abuse allegations. He said: âWe are now dealing with an unprecedented number of victims who are having the confidence and courage to come forward and report non-recent sexual abuse.
âIâm predicting an 88% increase [in allegations] this year. The police service will investigate approximately 70,000 allegations [of child abuse]. Thatâs the tip of the iceberg. We have to acknowledge as a society that the fact is hundreds of thousands of children have been abused and unfortunately are continuing to be abused.â
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/oct/07/police-chiefs-bbc-abuse-victims-westminster-paedophile-ring
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/08/jillings-report-north-wales-child-abuse
Penny Geer on January 28, 2023 at 11:45 am said:
“I contacted Operation Midland as a victim of historic abuse and soon wished I never had! The name of my abuser was changed by police in statements four times (to that of poor Harvey Proctor) and I withdrew from the inquiry as it was clearly fixed. I had to phone his solicitor ( a letter to him from police had been copied to me) to inform him I had refused to sign these statements and that his client was being set up!”
This is quite typical of the behaviour of police throughout the journalist-led ‘VIP paedophile hunt’. Harvey Proctor was a sitting duck. The police were warned to investigate Carl Beech and all other ‘VIP paedophile hunters’ before trashing Harvey Proctor and others’ lives. Their failure to take heed of every warning that they were spending millions on a dangerous game for ‘VIP paedophile hunters’ should see them fined and behind bars.
Some police were even proven to have ‘identified’ alleged paedophiles for fantasists and liars in some cases. With photographs. Simply because someone had already directly accused someone, or had mentioned their name in passing.
By all accounts, the sympathy and empathy shown by police towards people whom police knew to be fantasists and liars was quite overwhelming at times. So overwhelming in fact, that liars and fantasists found it quite encouraging. Causing them to chance their arm by adding more and more abuse to their original claims. Some joining up with other liars and fantasists, Sometimes in order to have entirely innocent people falsely charged and remanded into custody. To keep them incarcerated and away from exposing them for the frauds they were and still are, whilst they continued lying and hoaxing the police.
However, no matter how dangerously ‘VIP paedophile hunters’ were behaving towards their prey by lying to police that their prey was ‘violent and dangerous’, and no matter how irrationally and dangerously police were behaving in their collusions with liars and fantasists (without a scrap of evidence to do so) the main targets/prey were not held in prisons. Not even at the most critical and desperate time for ‘VIP paedo hunters’, when they had pulled out all the stops, and were left only with Esther Baker, whose credibility had already gone so far South of zero it was risible. Used and abused as a very last resort, to put the cherry on the cake, and have innocent people falsely charged and remanded to prison.
For clarity, Esther Baker does not need much persuading to do badass stuff. Which is why it is almost too sick for words that people such as Esther Baker and ‘Ash’ would ever be used in such a dangerous game. They are the ones who end up paying the heftiest price for taking part.
Be very clear, whilst some people make money and clout out of ‘VIP paedophile hunting’, it truly is only a game. An exciting, even exhilarating pastime for the majority of narcissists and other dangerous people whose lives have revolved around it. Much more on this subject in depth at a more suitable time.
If the very mention of Gwent police can cause such fear in some of the most extreme and dangerous trolls to have ever stalked, harassed and threatened people via social media, they must be bad. Or are they?
Although Gwent police do seem rather cagey about providing stats regarding ‘deaths in custody’ and suchlike, and are known to drag their feet in some cases, they do not appear to be in the same league as London Met police for beating people up at the point of arrest, or for killing people in custody. Nor are Gwent police renowned for discussing killing people in custody. Which is nice to know, if you or someone you know is ever arrested by them. Police are evidenced as having planned and plotted to make arrest without evidence. The London Met police are known to do this. Which is truly despicable and extremely bent.
It is unknown at this time if Gwent police themselves provide good coffee and rock buns during ‘interview’. However, it is known, that some police stations use cheap coffee and don’t even provide biscuits. Which does not enhance one’s police station experience one little bit. No police will allow you to take your own flask in either. Not that anyone has the time to make a flask of coffee when the police are kicking their back door in. So to speak.
Perhaps it is not Gwent police who are to be feared after all. Perhaps the real fear has been brought on by the thought of all the charges people will be facing, and the eventual sentencings. Some of the crimes still to be dealt with are almost ten years old. Most of which are extremely serious and gang-related. Proof of the gang relationships sometimes being provided by gang members themselves in the headers of malicious emails sent directly to their victims’ personal email addresses and to blog owners. The real names of such criminals who have been convicted and who are yet to be convicted, will not be appearing here at present due to ongoing matters and past court cases which are unresolved. However, some of their akas will now be used during the next few months. This being due to several sets of old and new circumstances and wounds which need some very serious attention being paid to them.
Amongst other things, threatening to blow someone’s brains out is called a ‘death threat’. In some cases this can also be called ‘witness intimidation’ and pcj. Placing graphic images of such on social media is very sick and can intimidate witnesses to serious crimes. Same with telephone call threats to beat people up. Same with threats to burn homes down. It is all ‘witness intimidation’. Harassment, stalking and lying to the police in order to prevent people from giving evidence in court cases is also ‘witness intimidation’. Not to mention pcj. Threatening people to stay away from social media because they expose gangs who act with extreme violence can also be intimidating to those involved in reporting serious and heinous crimes. Especially where people were told they would suffer consequences worse than death. Then of course, there is the matter of threatening to hack and the carrying out of such threat. Bank robbers who break into banks have been known to say they were only testing the bank’s security. Although this excuse never cuts it with the police and courts.
Ms Baker has wandered into some very silly territory in her tweets in which she appears to repeat or at the very least “highlight” previous allegations which she has been constrained from referencing ever again in the public domain. The context of her material yesterday is absolutely crucial to understanding why she has likely breached the injunction(s). It would also appear that she is attempting to prejudge an ongoing criminal investigation too which is also exceptionally unwise.
Esther Baker, L.I.P. In the mire. Continuing to bite the hands off the people trying to help pull her out. Her ‘VIP paedo hunter’ associates no longer showing support for her in public. Even @craftymuvva has run out of steam after spending ten years gang-stalking and harassing people. Being one of the very first on the ‘VIP paedo hunt’. Leaving trails of destruction.
Esther Baker is badass. No getting away from it. Like every other ‘VIP paedo hunter’, she knew that every false allegation she made would be repeated and commented on by thousands. This is why ‘VIP paedo hunters’ do it. Makes them and their associates ‘popular’. Brings in the clicks. It can pay some people very handsomely.
In next to no time, from the beginning of the ‘VIP paedo hunt’, every ‘VIP paedo hunter’ knew that if more than one of them at a time were to click their fingers at the police and feed them on bags of sh*t and lies, the police would be running around and doing their bidding.
The police had hard evidence and the power to stop the ‘VIP paedo hunt’ before it began. They chose not to use it. It was very much their own choice.
There is no getting away from the fact that police are solely to blame for allowing ‘VIP paedo hunters’ such as Esther Baker, to continue making false allegations to cripple innocent people. Police are also solely to blame for allowing all the harassment, stalking and threats to go on year after year for the past ten years.
In some of the most notorious cases, police are already proven to have assisted, colluded and conspired with ‘VIP paedo hunters’ in a manner which makes them completely indistinguishable from the ‘VIP paedophile hunters’ themselves. Such is the damage they have done and conspired to do to victims of false allegations and serious crimes.
None of the police involved in the ‘VIP paedo hunt’ were situated in isolated police stations without electric or running water. All of them had access to the pnc. They all police areas where the budgets are so enormous, grotesque amounts of money can be squandered at will without question. Which it has been. On a witch hunt which police knew beyond doubt was a total scam from the outset.
It is not impossible for a lonely cop with very little to do, working in isolation at the world’s end, to be gullible enough to be duped by a ‘VIP paedo hunter’s false allegations. It is not impossible for two cops in a completely isolated area to be duped by a VIP paedo hunter. It would fill up their day and give them something to do for their pay. However, when dozens, and latterly hundreds of cops were found going along with false allegations made by extremely dangerous ‘VIP paedo hunters’, without a scrap of evidence between them all, it became apparent that this is not about rotten apples within policing, but rather the barrel itself which is rotten.
Police are not vetted as thoroughly as the public wants and needs them to be. All police involved in the ‘VIP paedo hunt’ should be investigated before they can do any more damage to members of the public than they have already done.
Who knew there were such vast amounts of evidence against those who set out to ‘fuck people up’ and make threats to life and limb, whilst simultaneously lying and and fantasising in synch to the police about entirely innocent people ‘harassing and stalking’ them.
Projection much?
All police involved with the ‘vip paedo hunter’ gang truly are an absolute disgrace to policing for withholding and hiding all the evidence made available to them.
R.I.P. to those who died whilst waiting for police to get off their lazy, bent backsides and do the job they are paid to do, without fear or favour.
Some people may find this link useful. Others won’t.
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/public-justice-offences-incorporating-charging-standard
Couldn’t enjoy Easter. Not with knowing ‘hundreds’ of abused children and underage teenagers are still waiting to be rescued from the clutches of Parliamentary paedophile gangs. It appears these children have now been kicked to the back of the queue. Effectively abandoned. This, after ten years of relentless ‘campaigning’ by self-styled ‘paedophile hunter’ gangs who sat around tweeting their little hearts out 24/7 to ‘save the children from paedophiles’. Calling it ‘work’, and begging for donations to their ’causes’. Stating that this would be the hill they would die on. That “nobody must change the words” they have spoken about the people they have named as paedophiles.
Remember this. About not changing their words. Because this is important. These are the words they said they would stand by until death. Words they would use in court if if anyone were to have them arrested or threatened to sue them. Because they have seen the ‘proof’ of everything they have stated about alleged paedophiles whom they regularly named on the most popular social media platforms. That if they were to die, their death must be questioned. That they could end up dead in a suitcase. Allegedly, because they have been targeted by the Establishment, Gubmint, and ‘paedophile protectors’ in general.
The worst of whom allegedly congregate on this very site. Which is rather a rash allegation to make. Although fully commensurate with all other dangerous false allegations incessantly made by the same gang. No proof has been provided for this allegation. Because there isn’t any. Had there been proof, it would have been used by now. On twitter. To cause maximum humiliation. The ‘paedophile hunters’ deleted or hid the majority of their most dangerous threats to obstruct and pervert the course of justice, and had the social media accounts of their prey suspended and banned. In order to continue to make false allegations about innocents to police throughout the UK. To obstruct and pervert the course of justice. Fortunately, evidence of threats and malicious communications and evidence of doxxing had been saved. Police chose to ignore this evidence, hide this evidence, and eventually lie themselves in collusion with some of the most dangerous people ever witnessed in action on social media. (Should anyone wish to argue with this, please supply evidence of any gang you believe to be worse.)
Current reasons for the abandonment of children allegedly being abused by Parliamentarians: Chemtrails, Catholics, monks and murder (by vax).
This is subject to change. Depending upon which topics attract the most people to them. Thus maximising the income of commentators who are monetised. Reaching a wider audience for people who may wish to make donations, buy cups of coffee etc. In some cases it is known that some people set up regular direct debits to pay for the ‘work’ of people who are saving abused children by their regular use of twitter and other social media platforms. Nice work, if you can get it. Although the word ‘work’ is perhaps stretching it a little. Stretching it quite a bit more in other cases.Â
Just about managed to get a Creme Egg down me on Sunday afternoon.  Microwaved.  Not fried. Didn’t feel right to sit around eating Easter eggs when journalist-led gangs of people have led us to believe that the cellars and dungeons of Westminster are full of abused children. Children who have been laid out on slaughter tables for the entertainment of Parliamentarians, and subjected to horrors which only the likes of Carl Beech could imagine. eg. Crates of angry bees and wasps being let loose on them and whatnot.Â
Carl Beech lied about this happening to him. However, we are informed by journalist-led ‘paedophile hunters’, that Carl Beech was only prosecuted to prevent other abused people coming forward.
However, this does not mean other children are not being stung by bees and wasps right now. Today. Possibly this coming weekend. Who knows? It is unknown if there are time-tables or rotas for Parliamentary paedophiles to abuse all the abducted children, and other children who are specially selected to be chauffeured from home, whilst their parents work night shifts (see Esther Baker about this). However, the public is assured by journalist-led ‘paedophile hunters’ that it is still going on. And for the past ten years, ‘paedophile hunters’ have been ‘persecuted’ for saying so. Which on the surface appears terribly unfair. However, once the surface is scratched, it becomes apparent that nobody is being ‘persecuted’ for any such matter. It is disingenuous to suggest otherwise, when in the pursuit of the public’s spare cash or direct debits etc.
It is known that in some cases, the public are not donating towards what they believe they are donating towards. Since events in ‘Gwent’ last year, it is known that there are people who will throw money at very expensive legal teams, in order to discover the identities of people whom they themselves have harassed, stalked and written maliciously about.Â
Although they are in full knowledge that the police have already investigated and found their prey to be entirely innocent of all the nasty false allegations made against them.
But do keep coughing up your dosh, dear public. It is very easy to set up a direct debit. Without your donations to support the tweeters on twitter, Parliamentary paedophile gangs will continue to flourish. Nobody else can save these abused children. Because apart from journalist-led paedophile hunter gangs, nobody else knows where the f*ck in Parliament these children are being hidden!
 And now, we are informed that the 77th Brigade have been in the mix…
*Waves* to the 77th Brigade. Took your time, didn’t you. Late to the party. It was about time some of you got off your backsides and kept an eye on the people who really do need eyes kept on them. Pity you weren’t established by 2013/2014 when the paedophile conspiracists were at screaming pitch. Now, that was a subversive time, if ever there was one.
The paranoia the 77th have now created in certain quarters is hilarious! Many thanks. Stick around. Carry on. Some members of the public are actually grateful that such units exist. Since discovering how many subversive, criminal police are in the ranks, Britain needs every special unit they can muster.
It is alleged the 77th have special powers to tap into electronic devices and search files and email. If so, did they see how many VPNs are used amongst the ‘paedophile hunter’ gangster types? If the 77th are short of some of their email addresses and twitter handles ‘for correspondence only’, the info is available immediately upon request.
Gosh, how exciting it must be to be one of the people chosen by the 77th. Certain people who have always bigged themselves up about the importance of their ‘work’, and how they have always been under surveillance, have often fantasised about the 77th ‘watching’ them.
Would suspect some people would have been dead chuffed about having the 77th on their tail, had they not so much stuff to hide. Rather unfair that some people get the 77th, but bent London Met police won’t even touch evidence with a barge pole. Or until the CPS forces them to hand it over đ€Ł
Would say it’s not OK, when in the middle of a court case or two (or three or four) to make a fillum heavily laden with snipes towards the people involved in those court cases.
The comparison of legal costs is hilarious. Who wouldn’t use their personal expertise to save thousands of pounds per day in legal costs?
Those left disappointed by her latest fillum, should watch her early morning maniacal rant to David Icke fillum. Always good for a laugh. Great video to share with friends who need cheering up if they’re unwell or down in the dumps.
The level of resentment towards the owner of this blog for having offered to assist her victims is strong. Which is concerning. The resentment towards all her other victims is also concerning. Ten years on. No change.