Readers can tell recent allegations that Milo Yiannopoulos defended paedophilia are false for a simple reason – leftists are not lining up to laud him. Matthew Hopkins News puts Milo in his proper context.
Milo Yiannopoulos is a thoughtful and kindly man, not a defender of paedophiles, which is why hard left wingers hate him. Milo pictured with Matthew Hopkins News editor Sam Smith.
For years, the left has attacked Conservatives with intimidation, innuendo and smears. At the same time, a variety of left-wingers in a variety of guises have sought to defend, mitigate and humanise the vilest of sex offenders. Noted activist Peter Tatchell in the UK contributed to the book ‘Betrayal of Youth’ in which he wrote, “What purpose does it [the age of majority] serve other than reinforcing a set of increasingly quaint, minority moral values left over from the Victorian era?” Some on the left literally want to abolish the age of consent entirely.
During the #GamerGate scandal about ethics in gaming journalism, Milo Yiannopoulos exposed several particularly sinister individuals, including the infamous ‘Sarah’ Nyberg (archive here), a transsexual who claimed to be a white nationalist paedophile and to be attracted to the white half of a mixed-race preteen girl. Yiannopoulos also exposed the creepy leftists defending ‘her’ (archive here).
Unfortunately, whilst giving a recent interview to supposed fellow Conservatives Milo made a number of jokes about Catholic priests and his own outrageous sexuality that went, perhaps, too far. As he says, if he came across incorrectly through his, “own sloppy phrasing or through deceptive editing” (archive here) well – that happens. The jokes about an abusive teacher are similar to those told by many comedians such as Ricky Gervais, who has joked about the holocaust (archive here) and abusive Catholic priests (archive here).
Milo’s mistake was to forget that when the media are the enemy even an agent provocateur must be on their guard, and that not all supposed fellow Conservatives or Republicans are loyal to the cause. Whilst the Guardian gloats as Milo’s book deal was cancelled (archive here), Milo was immediately offered a new book deal by Vox Day’s Castalia house (archive here).
As Vox says, the error of true Conservatives and the alt-right is to try to use platforms loyal to their opponents. A huge mistake by Milo was to make use of mainstream publisher Simon and Schuster, who will now lose out on substantial profits. On the other hand Castalia and Yiannopoulos will do very well. I will certainly be pre-ordering and promoting the book if and when Castalia has it.
Whilst the sobbers sob and the hysterics scream about Milo’s remark, it is worth remembering Salon.com’s 2015 article by self-confessed paedophile Todd Nickerson, in which he admitted to his lust for children but then complained of the “vile right-wing hate machine”. Today I was unable to locate any of Nickerson’s content on Salon. Instead I could only find articles on other sites condemning it, such as the Daily Mail (archive here).
Like the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s 1984, the left is quietly forgetting its own positions in order to attack Milo. Milo’s supporters will not have it and of all people, President Donald Trump knows how unfair and biased the media can be. It is unlikely he will have it either.
On a personal level, I have known what it is like to face overblown allegations as well as flat out false ones. Gaffes pass and fade – and indeed the media needs to be careful not to overplay its hand. Any publication that misrepresents or exaggerates Milo’s statements may face is at risk of libel action and significant damages. More importantly paedophilia is one of the weakest issues for ‘Social Justice Warriors’ because so many of them are either paedophiles or their defenders. The left has far more to lose than Milo if they decide to shine a light into the dark corners where abusers hide.
Very good piece. I am conflicted on whether or not to share it, considering you SPAMMED the fuck out of everybody on GAB with it. But a good piece, nonetheless.
I didn’t know Milo is a rape victim/was sexually abused by a pedophile, but it doesn’t seem like that is what people are interested in with this. On one news site a video was linked as a source and it’s from April 2016 so that one was around then or earlier, and I see another site saying the other show was in July 2016. Someone on /pol/ said there was hundreds of thousands of dollars spent by someone to investigate Milo, and some anons noted that it looked like a coordinated effort to spread this.
I kind of believe it because why else would such old statements resurface and be used for viral outrage now?
I’ve been seeing the same people who defend pedophiles like ‘Sarah’ Nyberg now claiming Milo is a pedophile. Some of the members of the anti-Gamergate Skype group/Crash Override Network are even involved in trying to trash Milo, because of course they would be.
In fact, let us take a look at the CON group, the group of people gathered by Zoe Quinn/Chelsea Van Valkenburg and were trying to use claims of child porn to get 8chan and other GamerGate hubs shut down, spent their Christmas of 2014 buying a reddit ad to promote their pedophile conspiracy against GamerGate, organized resistance to defend one of their own when his history of pedophilia was dug up, and also filed police reports against Milo because he was tweeting and exposing Nicholas Nyberg’s pedophile past (http://archive.is/d2eWz#selection-14353.0-14383.87).
Katherine “quinnae moon” Cross claims that Milo made a habit out of “false” claims of pedophilia and whines about his Breitbart articles. (http://archive.is/e2N07)
Shortly before these allegations spread, Jake “SecretGamerGirl” Alley was claiming Milo’s fans were executing people in the streets at Milo’s command (http://archive.is/7aJxc) and committing mass shootings. (http://archive.is/0IU99). Alley has also been trying to defend ‘Sarah’ Nyberg, such as implying Nyberg was a “random girl” on the 18th (http://archive.is/deS2i) or lying that all the evidence pulled from Nyberg’s own chat logs was fabricated and “fake news” (http://archive.is/6YUX8). Among other things, Alley is now claiming Milo says he is gay “as a euphemism for his lust for children” (http://archive.is/umeD4).
David Gallant claims Milo has “associated with pedophiles” before (http://archive.is/csKby). A bold claim with absolutely zero evidence, unless you count Milo emailing Nyberg for comment?
Remy/StephenAtWar accuses Milo of “malicious and cruel behavior” (http://archive.is/VIC4g), and more interestingly snipes at Zoe Quinn/Chelsea Van Valkenburg and accuses her of not paying people who do work for her (http://archive.is/BT3Q5).
Chris Kluwe thinks Milo is a “bigoted neo-nazi” (http://archive.is/lkb0w) and wonders when reddit/chans will try to make Milo kill himself (http://archive.is/FKdmp).
Izzy Galvez implies Milo is a “Neo-Nazi pedophile” (http://archive.is/30odC)
Peter Coffin spitefully revels in Milo’s misfortune and loss of his publishing contract (http://archive.is/vThU5).
Dan Olson, who, on behalf of this anti-Gamergate Skype group, downloaded what he thought was child pornography in order to attack 8chan (why? because GamerGate was being discussed there) complains that it took years for Milo to get ‘punished’ like he and the group desired in 2014 (http://archive.is/KLvF3).
AthenaHollow is just as vile as she was in 2014 (http://archive.is/A8mrE), but encourages people to not mock Milo’s surname because it triggers her Greek-surnamed husband (http://archive.is/6Ar3b).
Arthur Chu says Milo’s explanation of his actions are “meaningless” and complains because Milo name dropped Nyberg as one of the pedophiles he exosed. (http://archive.is/3lo8I).
What about the person who started GamerGate and helped give Milo all his fame and attention in that aspect? Chelsea “Five Guys: Burgers and Fries” Van Valkenburg is grave dancing and bragging that she still has a “book deal” for her vaporware book (described as ramblings of an insane person by someone who read a draft http://archive.is/nqVW9), although she was also dumped by Simon and Schuster last year (http://archive.is/XXQOw).
Leaving the worst for last, the pedophile “edgelord” himself Nicholas “Sarah Butts” Nyberg makes several, mostly false, claims about Milo including a ludicrous lie that the photo used in the Breitbart article of a ridiculously hairy, shirtless Nyberg was “stolen revenge pornography” of himself as a 15-year-old ‘woman’ (http://archive.is/DH2Zx).
This is going to backfire massively. I can’t wait until the tables are turned on these media whores.
Milo will survive this stronger than ever, and really the only negative is his loss of the book deal, which is apparently already mitigated by a potential replacement publisher, so he’s really already all good.
Thank you for an informative post.
As someone who truly has experienced this vile situation with two different men while I was young, I 1000% stand with Milo. Like he said I didn’t let it become me I used my drive and dedication to move forward and become a successful human being. I was a little boy and would have never considered what happened to ever being able to happen but it does. The whole argument is what is pedophilia? Is it before sex organs develop or not?