The Failures of Ofsted’s Sarah Canto and Jo Fisher, Director of Hertfordshire Children’s Services

Jo Fisher

Jo Fisher, the Executive Director of Children’s Services at Hertfordshire County Council, has achieved a supposed, ‘Outstanding’ for her department on a recent Ofsted inspection … but is it deserved, or have systemic problems been missed by the regulator?

In modern public life, it has become all too clear that there are two sorts of public services that achieve, “Outstanding” ratings on regulatory inspections. Those which are actually delivering a good service, and those which simply hide failures and conceal problems, including abuse. For example, a hospital for the vulnerable known as Whorlton Hall received a CQC rating of, ‘good’ until it was exposed by BBC Panorama as an institution in which staff systematically, cruelly, abused disabled adults (archive). A clue as to which sort Hertfordshire County Council (HCC) is can be found in a Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) report from 2021, reported in the Herts Advertiser that, “Herts Council has ‘pattern of mishandling children’s services complaints'” (archive). At the time, the Hertfordshire County Council, Director of Children and Young People was Jo Fisher. MHN has been horrified recently to identify similar and ongoing problems, some of which have now been admitted, which have not been picked up in a recent Ofsted inspection of the authority. The circumstances raise questions about the leadership and suitability of Jo Fisher, Sarah Canto from Ofsted who recently inspected Hertfordshire County Council Children’s Services and also Amanda Spielman, Chief Inspector at Ofsted. Weak leadership and weak procedures risk enabling abuse. In my opinion, Hertfordshire County Council and Ofsted have both.

Hertfordshire County Council Safeguarding Times

Hertfordshire County Council safeguarding times … could be improved … if this output from its system is to be believed, showing a child safeguarding referral open for around 20 months. Screenshot anonymised and taken on 11 April 2023.

How long should it take a council to deal with a safeguarding concern? A week, two weeks? A month? Baby P did not even live two years, and he spent much of it experiencing horrific abuse (archive) before his tragic death at 17 months. The question is not rhetorical. I made three child protection referrals about a family (who have been anonymised here), via the Hertfordshire County Council system and the first is still showing as, ‘Open’ after nearly two years. Reading the referral screen, I was concerned that at best, the council workflow system is insufficiently robust. At worst the case was ignored.

Child protection matters in the UK are rightly highly confidential. I would not expect much response as the result of a referral. I would have expected, however, the state to change from, ‘open’ to, ‘triaged’ or ‘reviewed’. In fact, until a recent complaint, I have never had anything from the council beyond an automated email acknowledgement to show these reports were submitted. It is clear, however, that something happened with the more recent ones due to what seems to be a subsequent breach of confidence by the council.

Continue reading

Share Button

End of Year Court Case Roundup – Hemming v Poulton and Smith v Baker

It is the end of the year and this is a brief, scheduled post to set out the current state of play in the court proceedings I am, or have been, a party to in Hemming v Poulton. This is partly to counter-balance Sonia Poulton’s misleading comments about it.

Sonia Poulton Video Statement

Poulton has found her tough talk is no substitute for legal merit.

Smith v Baker – Total victory. I sued Esther Baker and defended a counter-claim, representing myself. Her defence was largely struck out and she agreed to a lifelong restraining order. Baker counter-sued for libel and harassment. Her counterclaim was struck out and summarily judged in my favour because she failed to Reply to my defence of truth. My articles stay up. She is paying my costs back in instalments. It will take her a very long time.

Hemming v Poulton, Smith and Laverty – John Hemming is suing Sonia Poulton for libel and breach of the GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018. Sonia has counter-sued Hemming myself and Darren Laverty for harassment. Darren counter-counterclaimed for libel. So far, Sonia has settled with Darren and had a small part of her Particulars struck out.

Bizarrely, Sonia has claimed on her fundraising page and on Twitter that in the proceedings the court has accepted that she is a journalist against opposition by John Hemming at a hearing on 14 July 2022. No such decision was made because it is not in issue. The court order, which is public, simply adjourns the hearing and the judge remarks it is due to Poulton raising further matters the night before. We are seeking our costs of the hearing thrown away in all circumstances.

Continue reading

Share Button

Despicable Andrew Burnham MP Must Never Hold Public Office Again

Andy Burnham MP

Andrew Burnham MP must be sacked and disgraced. (Picture via Open Government License 1.0)

The Witchfinder responds to Labour MP Andrew Burnham’s literally unbelievable comments on the Mid-Staffordshire Inquiry, that demonstrate that Labour still does not understand the paramount need for transparency, accountability and whistleblowing in the NHS.

Think back to your schooldays. Imagine your class. Say, what, 30 people? Picture them all dead. Needlessly. Now imagine school assembly. Say, 300 people? Picture them dead. Now twice that. Dead. Double again. Dead. All dead. 1,200 tragic, unnecessary, corpses.

That was the reality of the Mid-Staffordshire Inquiry. Under Labour’s culture of fear and cover-up, ‘trust’ (some might say voter perception) was more important than truth. As many as 1,200 people died needlessly under NHS ‘care’.

Continue reading

Share Button

Epic Safeguarding Fail – Why Lynda Bull Should be Sacked

Milton Keynes Council Fail

Milton Keynes’ new Safeguarding Policy does almost nothing to prevent a repeat of its recent court humiliation. Picture licensed via Dreamstime.

The Witchfinder points out some truths that liberals find inconvenient. The hysteria underlying witch hunts has a kernel of truth and they often serve a useful purpose when the institutions governing our society are not functioning to protect it. Turning to the recent scandal involving the unlawful detention of an old woman by Milton Keynes Council your humble inquisitor sets out the case for Director Lynda Bull’s career in social care to come to an end.

This site first learned of the case of Milton Keynes Council v RR & Ors [2014] EWCOP B19 on the website of the beautiful and eternally well-informed Dr Lucy Series. It seemed an all too familiar story. An elderly woman was removed from her home and detained unlawfully. The woman’s son objected and was investigated over ‘safeguarding’ allegations. After 16 months the council abandoned the allegations. It was a horrifying abuse of an elderly woman by a local authority.

In several cases where the Witchfinder has been McKenzie Friend, local authorities have retaliated against the family members of service users by bringing long and drawn out investigations and making questionable findings. Councils do have a legitimate role in safeguarding – the hallmarks of an improper investigation are an extremely long period of investigation (itself potentially harmful to the service user) and no interest in procedural safeguards.

Continue reading

Share Button

2000+ Unlawfully Detained. Families of Abuse Victims Condemn Jeremy Hunt

Jeremy Hunt

Jeremy Hunt. Secretary of State for Health. Image licensed under the Open Government Licence v1.0. This permits adaptation. However, the Witchfinder has resisted the temptation to scrawl the obvious four letter word across his forehead.

Catastrophically failing Care Quality Commission admits that thousands of people have been deprived of their liberty in the UK without proper notification – but they do not know who, where, or how many.

CQC admits that at least 7,238 criminal registration offences against vulnerable people have not been prosecuted putting the United Kingdom apparently in violation of the United Nations Optional Convention Against Torture.

CQC Whistleblower Kay Sheldon claims that David Prior, new Chief Executive, told her that she would not be re-appointed. CQC office asked to put allegation to Mr Prior and responds refusing to ‘confirm or deny’ allegation. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has failed to clearly back Mrs Sheldon.

Yvonne Goder of charity FACT, which campaigns for victims against abuse of people without capacity describes Jeremy Hunt, Secretary of State for Health and responsible for the CQC as ‘morally no different from the abusers at Winterbourne View’ and calls for his immediate sacking from government. Mark Neary, father of Steven Neary agrees with the comparison.

Continue reading

Share Button