Yesterday, MHN posted a damning exposé about Caroline Farrow. She was quite a bit upset with my media inquiry letter which was sent beforehand to give her a chance to point out any factual errors. Caroline went so far as posting on Twitter that my media inquiry made her, “throw up in fear” (archive). Today, a user called ‘Erasmus of Rotterdam’, posted bizarre allegations on Kiwifarms, claimed to have hacked MHN and the editor’s PC, but was especially upset about questions 10 and 11 in the letter. Those questions were never published. There are grounds for investigation as to whether the poster was in fact Caroline Farrow, sock-puppetting.
Kiwifarms user ‘Erasmus of Rotterdam’ posts allegations so fake even Dynastia calls them out. But this person has seen a private letter I shared only with three people. Click for full size.
So, who could it be? Firstly, I do not have a copy of anything uploaded to Kiwi Farms so if a copy of the letter was actually uploaded, I have not verified it is the real letter. However, the poster must have at least seen the real letter to know about the questions. So, there is a limited pool of suspects.
Full disclosure. I do not normally correspond with Stephanie Hayden but as they were a subject of the story, I sent them a copy of my letter. Another went to Simon Just. Finally of course, a copy was sent to Farrow via her solicitors. Not long after, Louise Moody claimed to have read the letter. From time to time, Caroline Farrow has been advised by Adrian Yalland, so I considered he might have had a copy. All of these people have at times been accused of sock-puppetting, save that I discount Farrow’s solicitors as likely culprits having no reason to suspect them of socking nor breach of confidence.
The ‘Erasmus of Rotterdam’ account was created on 1 September 2022. It is an account mostly notable for a virulent hatred of transgender persons, variously describing them as fat, eunuch, paedophiles (note the British spelling of ‘paedophile’ as opposed to the American, ‘pedophile’). The account was created before my beef with Farrow and comments mostly on a debate my supporters and I have little involvement in. Beyond a suspicion they are British, who could it be.
But … we have such a short suspects list. Who would be really, really upset about my article about Caroline Farrow? Who would claim to have hacked my hard drive, when they only actually have access to one document – clumsily trying to be, “down with the kids”, if you can call the members of a stalking site, “kids”. I could just imagine Erasmus beginning a post with, “Hello fellow Kiwi Farmers”. Indeed, I had been talking about this with Hayden and Just all day, also separately with the hacktivist Echo. Echo is a younger woman in her twenties and by eerie coincidence had made the very same point about Farrow being a cringe user of Kiwi Farms.
So, I decided to make use of a tool we have had for some time. An AI neural text analyser.The tool enables you to take an anonymous post and try to match it to text of suspected author. It is not always a suitable tool, especially with a wide set of suspects. However, it can be a useful and little know part of our arsenal. There are risks, of course. Kiwi Farmers are aware of textual analysis and sometimes try to subvert it, for example in the past Joshua Moon wrote an anonymous menacing letter with elements of my textual style at a time when a number of mass death threats were being sent out. The plan failed when he made a panicked admission to sending one of the letters – meaning he became a suspect for the others, too. The article with that history, a copy of the letter and Josh’s eventual admission is here.
In this case though, the ‘Erasmus of Rotterdam’ account is obscure. It has not been of especial interest to any person. There is no reason to suspect it of being an incredibly sophisticated false flag. No reason to suspect an attempt to frame anyone. So who could it be? MHN collected text samples from blog articles and the twitter accounts of all five suspects. Hayden seems slightly more prolix so her sample was larger. This works against her, because it means there was a greater surface to match, skewing the test towards Hayden’s guilt. The samples were checked against 50 posts by the Erasmus user. Despite the bias against Hayden, Farrow came top of five.
Analysis by machine learning software, skewed toward’s Hayden’s guilt, put Farrow top of five suspects.
So, it was quite clearly not Yalland or Moody. I dropped the two lowest scoring suspects from the list. Then, I rectified the data by deleting, strictly chronologically, older Hayden tweets until the three samples remaining of Farrow, Hayden and Just were of roughly the same size (though Hayden’s was still slightly bigger).
Analysis by machine learning software, with skew removed, put Farrow top of three suspects.
So, in conclusion this does not prove Farrow’s guilt. However, in my opinion there are clearly grounds for investigation as to whether the poster was Farrow and whether the poster committed crimes, being:
- The post purportedly confessed to the crime of hacking
- Farrow was one of a few people who knew about the final questions in the letter
- Farrow was upset by the questions
- The poster’s history is consistent with Farrow’s political agenda and disdain for transgender persons
- Farrow is under police investigation for posts by her alleged sock-puppets on Twitter
- Farrow has been accused of sock-puppetry over a period of years, by persons from all political sides, for example by Tim Ireland of Bloggerheads (archive)
- An AI analysis tool repeatedly put Farrow as the top suspect, even when the data was skewed in favour of Stephanie Hayden’s guilt
Your author has not seen the letter uploaded to the Kiwi Farms. If anyone has a copy they can email me, that would be of interest.
Caroline Farrow is incredibly cringe.
A literal who.
Her entire claim to fame is based on being friends with Rowling, Kiwi Farms scandal & baiting on Twitter.
Don’t get me wrong, free speech is incredibly important, but so is not being an idiot, and idk bro, posting on Kiwi Farms under your legitimate identity while being a public figure and actively watched by journalists, doesn’t really sound like a mega-mind move.
Caroline is going to bat for the site & its owner with basically no lore on anything. She’s too much of a “newfag” to understand that among the criticisms of KF being “mean” or “misgendering” people, there are some legitimate criticisms such as the fact the site literally hosts revenge porn without the ages of the subjects/time of age in images proven as being 18+, the fact that jannies claim that section230 means they can’t edit or delete content yet mess with people’s accounts, usernames and pfps, or maybe the fact that Joshua, who claims to have fought so hard for the site due to free speech, has literally banned people for calling him fat in Kiwi chat.
Caroline is jumping on the bandwagon and trying to cry censorship, without realizing that there are many alt right & pro free speech critics of KF.
She turned up 5 minutes ago and decided to clout chase, play victim and bullshit everyone, and honestly, Kiwis should find it as off putting as outsiders.
“Empress Null” who are you?
She made a whole fuss about the cops accusing some account of being her, and then decided to show up and post under her real name anyway.
She’s a literal lolcow and deserves a thread.
The whole boomer being hip shit honestly makes me cringe more than anything else I’ve seen anyone post in the past year.
Yikes.
Yeah. Also, her supporters have been posting that you and I fell out, which is hilarious.
>supporters
🤣
The thing is, people can’t get over their seething hatred of you long enough to actually take in any facts.
I legitimately believe that most of these Caroline Farrow dick-riders are only doing so because “enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
Let’s be honest, in any other situation, everyone would be calling Caroline cringe and making fun of her teeth.
So, have you and [Echo] not fallen out then? Cuz there was a post that went up and then down?
[Edit by MHN – slight redactions]
No we are good. Just minor and temporary annoyance on my part at minor leaks.
However bottom line is that Echo is a fairly normal woman and most of what the Kiwis et al write about her is deranged incel fanfiction. I have seen her under bright lights. Her thighs are blemish free so the self-harm is a deep-fake or someone else’s photographs. Same with the other lurid images. All fake.
It is predictable but pathetic that the Kiwis would be so alarmed at my meeting a real female person in really real life. This is because many of them are the people basement dwelling trolls look down on and shun.
Also sometimes I just think Kiwi Farmers make thread posts up as they go along lol.
Why does no one fact check anything?
First I’m in the UK, then working for a company in Ohio, then spamming lolcow.farm, “oh wait no that was someone else, whoops”. Suppose the people impersonating me on The Fediverse & recreating my old website don’t exactly help, lmao. That’s what I get for being a POI.
Gosh Echo, you do get around! Sorry for being a little flippant under a serious subject.
I did confess under another post that I almost joined Kiwi Farms some years ago. I was convalescing circa 6 years ago and watching a lot of YouTube videos and became aware that there was a conspiracy corner on YouTube (seems to have got worse since lockdown). There was a thread about the loony ‘transvestigation’ conspiracy theory (claiming that most famous women are really men and vice versa). For the record, the Kiwifarms thread was criticising or making fun of the nutty theory. In the end I didn’t join Kiwifarms – just as well as they have a dark side.
I hope you are okay now, Echo.
For clarity as I’m not Echo it would have been better if I’d phrased the last sentence of my above post “Echo, I hope you are okay now”
No, nor are we hooking up. We are friends. I find the suggestion or implication that I just bang anyone I’m seen in a photo with insulting lol. I’m probably asexual, and very career focused rather than relationships or sex focused. Women can’t exist online without being called whores, or having assumptions made about their sex/love lives. I wish KF was a little less misogynistic, all of the “BPD” comments that only appear on threads about women, really would put me off using the site as a cis woman.
That moment, when a dangerous twitter account holder invites Sonia Poulton and some of her gang-stalkers to join them in supporting Caroline Farrow on twitter. Can see all this will be going down like a dose of salts. lol The ‘joining of dots’ being something which only Sonia Poulton and her ‘outlaw’ gang are allowed to do, under her personal and orchestrated supervision on social media. (London Met police have evidence of such, with all dates, fyi.)
The dangerous twitter account holder appears not to have received the memo to keep their head down until after all her court cases. They must be either dim or somewhat vindictive towards her, to ignore the fact even her most dangerous and ardent hench men and police informants are keeping themselves under the radar regarding her paedophilia accusations. ie. To prevent them from bringing her false allegations into more prominence at this time. Perhaps swap accusing people of being paedophiles, for looking up at the sky for ‘chemtrails’. Then nobody gets hurt and damaged by you and your followers, and you can amuse non followers instead.
The account holder certainly hasn’t received the panic memo either. Where because she has put police and her own gang members at risk for revealing their collusion in fabricating evidence against her prey, and putting her prey in the most extreme danger, she does not want people on social media continuing to quote her and her ‘evidence’ regarding who and who is not a ‘paedophile’ in Parliament and the entertainment industry. That is, until such time as she recovers from ‘personal problems’ and court cases, and is able to fulfil her promise to her followers that she will not be silenced, and will continue to ‘expose’ those whom she accuses of paedophilia and ‘paedo enabling’.
[Redacted by MHN]
Some followers of the aforementioned, may wish to read the authors of this and other blogs for the facts and outcomes of Sonia Poulton’s previous court cases. Relying on her twisted and emotive strategic viewpoints in her own blogs regarding the author of this blog and those whom he assists, will not save or assist you in court. Be sure not to tell Caroline Farrow you will support her all the way into court, unless you are absolutely sure you do not have any skeletons lurking in your own cupboards. It can become terribly messy for the police and cps if you have. Whatever you say in support to the police or lawyers will be discovered, and used against you in criminal and civil courts at a later date.
For the umpteenth time: There is no evidence of any of the accused being paedophiles or ‘paedo enablers’. Had there been any evidence, Sonia Poulton would have been able to provide it on any day during the past ten years. But she hasn’t done. Because she and all other ‘journalists’ and the owner of this blog have known from the outset, that the ‘paedo hunt’ scam is a scam concocted by ‘journalists’ and politicos. A rather lucrative scam. Although the filthy lucre appears to have only landed in the pockets of lawyers and those ‘journalists’ who were lucky enough to bag a Baker or a Beech. Whereas using dangerous liars from hell hole kids’ homes turned out not to be at all lucrative. On account of them being exposed by genuine victims of child abuse who knew the child care system inside out. Unlucky for some…
Has this actually happened, Rory, or are you thinking forewarned is forearmed (metaphorically)?
It is certainly clear that some missed the “staff meetings” and are determined to continue to make things up as they are going along in a very desperate attempt to avoid close scrutiny of their own and their “masters”/”mistress” behaviour. It is also obvious from the same old tactics of labelling and false accusations of a similar nature (not this article which is asking a question not asserting something is true when it isn’t) that some people haven’t learnt a thing from their previous interactions with the authorities in recent months. More fool them.
What is more likely to happen now is that the authorities are sat shaking their heads in utter disbelief at the stupidity of some who are not only known to be under investigation but may also be under investigation and not yet dealt with. They all would be much wiser not commenting about Farrow’s case as subjudice is in play from the point of her arrest, not as some have wrongfully claimed at the point of charge.
Farrow’s own behaviour is only likely one of those issues to be dealt with and the very public “defence” that she has attempted to mount whilst still under investigation is not going to be seen as a wise move by the authorities and more probably as committing more alleged offences. Those who continue to incite her and her own incitement to harass others will more likely than not be used against her.
Tbh I feel sorry for her family, the locals in her village etc because it is becoming increasingly clear that they likely have been given not the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth about her serial conduct.
Whether she is “Erasmus” or not is a side show, she has very clearly however acted in bad faith by her conduct on Kiwi Farms and her promotion of it elsewhere.
As for the “down with the kids” patter this scene from “Still Game” sums it up neatly… https://youtu.be/G4-pPBGZguc
It would appear that some still don’t believe the subjudice aspect IS in play at the point of arrest, so if they don’t want to believe me, perhaps they will believe this from Pinsent Mason solicitors:
https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/the-sub-judice-rule-and-contempt-of-court#:~:text=Statutory%20contempt%20of%20court%3A%20Liability,the%20material%20was%20sub%20judice.
Criminal law is different to civil law as to when subjudice kicks in. But if you want to get your criminal law advice from individuals who have no training in it, then go ahead, just don’t come back and whinge if the public defence tactics result in criminal charges such as contempt or attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Sorry, but I couldn’t resist mentioning it.
If you look on her Kiwi Farms account, you’ll see her profile picture is her in a Kiwi Farms logo T-shirt.
As a former Kiwi & lolcow, I can tell you for sure that Josh never did a merch run with that T-shirt design.
This means that it was COMMISSIONED. Yup, that’s right, Caroline Farrow went on a website and PAID for a custom made Kiwi Farms shirt.
When Josh called her out on this, she claimed that someone sent it to her Anonymously which sounds like the biggest lie ever considering that would be implying that:
A) Caroline just has so many fans that send her clothes in the post (she’s a literal who JK Rowling tag along, no one is sending her merch, she’s not Johnny Depp)
B) This anonymous sender happened to know her exact clothing size
C) This anonymous sender also knew what Kiwi Farms was, and then decided to get a custom made T shirt for Caroline Farrow with it’s logo
D) This person violated the Copyright by using The Kiwi Farms logo for something other than fair use
Absolutely ridiculous lol.
So fucking embarrassing.
“Criminal law is different to civil law as to when subjudice kicks in. But if you want to get your criminal law advice from individuals who have no training in it, then go ahead, just don’t come back and whinge if the public defence tactics result in criminal charges such as contempt or attempting to pervert the course of justice.”
Caroline Farrow is not showing any interest whatsoever in taking sensible advice about the law. Whilst her faux naivety and wholesome, [redacted at request of poster] act may have worked for her in decades gone by, it isn’t working anymore. Whilst it is nobody’s business but her own if she wants to puff around like an attention-seeking teenager on social media, looking like a [redacted at request of poster], it won’t help her case to be seen engaging with individuals who are associated with those who threaten to maim and kill and worse. Unlike some of her other more recently met associates, she is not being dealt with by bent police who would ignore or support this level of gang behaviour. Which can be torture for those on the receiving end of gang-stalking.
Should she continue in this vein, it should perhaps be recommended that she use oven gloves when picking up a Bible or any other Holy material.
Oven gloves were to be supplied to court in previous instances where certain dangerous, lying individuals were found to be preparing to swear on the Bible. As a precautionary measure. In case the Bible were to burst into flames. Which it was expected to do. Given that the majority of witnesses had previously denounced God in no uncertain terms…
Without discussing the specifics of the Farrow case, even now some are deluded enough to think that the law doesn’t apply to them. They are also wrong that subjudice only kicks in at point of charge and only applies to supposition about guilt.
That idea is completely wrong, subjudice is in play from point of arrest and is there to prevent manipulation of any outcome, innocence or guilt or even to try and manipulate the police into dropping an investigation ahead of natural completion.
It is subtlety different to the presumption of innocence but breaching subjudice rules causes unfair trials, miscarriages of justice and often gets guilty criminals off the hook. Thus denying a genuine victim of crimes their “day in court”.
There are very good reasons why the police and criminal defence lawyers tell potential defendanfs to STFU whilst under investigation as publicly stating that someone IS guilty/innocent is clearly an attempt to manipulate outcomes.
That is different to people having the PRESUMPTION of innocence.
Think of it as the difference between fact and belief. Anyone can believe something is true, doesn’t automatically mean it is true though.
Those reasons by the police telling a suspect to STFU are also to try and prevent the suspect from committing further offences and potentially expanding the ambit of the investigation.
What certain individuals also forget is that the police will follow evidence trails so what someone is arrested for initially may turn into other or additional offences being found during investigation. The suspect is unlikely to know what has been found until disclosure if charged and if the suspect has been acting in ways that confirm some of the original allegations during the time of investigation then it makes it more likely that charges of some nature, depending on case merit, would be in the public interest.
The seizure of devices won’t result in a swift return of them either whilst the investigation stage continues, those devices are in effect suspected crime scenes. If the devices are returned ahead of outcomes then again those outcomes could be influenced. If someone is charged with offences those devices may never get returned as a court could order them destroyed. Putting pressure on the police to return devices may be therefore seen as attempting to influence outcomes.
It could also be that the police have more evidence that the suspect and friends think they have.
Thus outright declarations of guilt or innocence regarding what charges or whether an arrest was right or wrong could be brought is again an attempt to manipulate outcomes.
The above link to Pinsent Masons article also makes it clear regarding “campaigns” being likely seen as contempt. If done at the pre charge stage they are likely to be seen as PCJ type offences, in my amateur opinion but that doesn’t mean that subjudice isn’t in play already.
Civil law subjudice kicks in when a trial date is set. Public discussion is allowed to that point. It is exceptionally important that people understand the distinct difference and especially those who claim to practice law for a living!
Elsewhere, and as another example of incorrect belief over truth, the obsession by some to keep blaming one man for accounts on Twitter that are not his, not operated or accessed by him etc says more about the obsessive person than it does about the falsely accused. It would also appear the supposed account owner of the obsessive account has a very poor memory… as confirmed elsewhere. That obsessional behaviour however is a clear course of conduct on so many different levels. Especially the public false allegations about one person running specific accounts. Yawn, change the record…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11282263/Moment-police-swoop-house-devout-catholic-mother-malicious-online-posts.html
“As a schoolgirl, Caroline Farrow relished discussing politics and current affairs around the kitchen table with her family.
Her parents, both teachers, encouraged robust debate and Caroline and her elder sister were precociously well informed.
‘Freedom of speech and expression was drummed into us from an early age,’ she says.
She was ten in 1984, a landmark year when George Orwell’s vision of a totalitarian future was revisited and reappraised. Her father explained the novel’s concepts of Big Brother, Newspeak and the Thought Police, and Caroline was fascinated.
‘But I remember thinking at the time that none of it could ever come true,’ she says.”
Now Caroline Farrow is finally finding out that Big Brother and The Thought Police were not simply story books, but prophecies which are coming true, it is perhaps time for someone to break it to her and her devoutly bigoted flock of hare-brained associates, that Mary Magdelene was a very sexy, black woman. And a high priestess…
SvT on December 14, 2022 at 10:38 am: “Elsewhere, and as another example of incorrect belief over truth, the obsession by some to keep blaming one man for accounts on Twitter that are not his, not operated or accessed by him etc says more about the obsessive person than it does about the falsely accused. It would also appear the supposed account owner of the obsessive account has a very poor memory… as confirmed elsewhere. That obsessional behaviour however is a clear course of conduct on so many different levels. Especially the public false allegations about one person running specific accounts. Yawn, change the record…”
During Sonia Poulton and her gang’s orchestrated phone calls, emails and personal contact with numerous bent police throughout the UK, her most dangerous hench men stated their prey were using dozens of sock accounts and making threats. When they and the police knew beyond doubt that at least four of their prey only used one account each, and that one of those prey had been nowhere near social media for six months, due to threats from the gang and the brutal murder of a family member.
To quote current American judges, and past British judges when passing sentence on criminals who have in the majority of cases, barely committed the level of heinous crimes which Sonia Poulton and her gang and the police have committed against innocent persons, “May God have mercy on their soul”. Because the harm and damage that these gang-stalking, false allegators and bent police have done, and are still doing, to entirely innocent people, can never be undone. It has been shown (see cps and victim statements for proof before any denials) that dangerously bent junior and senior police not only supported the gang, but also conspired with them to cause further harm, alarm and distress to each of the targets.
By the way, will all the children whom Sonia Poulton and her gang are trying to rescue from within the dungeons of Parliament, be getting a turkey dinner and Christmas presents this year? Or will they not be given a day off from being ‘strapped into dentist chairs’ and relentlessly ‘stung by thousands of bees’? Just asking. I sincerely hope ‘looking up at the sky for chemtrails’ has not been hampering the child rescue missions again.
1. I am able to state with authority that targets received intel concerning the gang, and police were forewarned in December 2015 and April 2016 that the gang were planning a huge effort to falsely accuse their prey of making threats via the use of countless socks. 2. Police were presented with a list of all known, and lesser known socks and email addresses of the gang, All of whom were themselves in fact, making all the threats which they were falsely accusing their prey of. All evidence supplied to police by more than one of the prey, and latterly to cps. Due to bent police from various areas of the UK deliberately hiding it. Therefore, the prey could state on oath police were fully aware of crimes in progress, and that there was a concerted effort to have the gang’s prey put behind bars in the following year. When the maximum sentencing for stalking was expected to be doubled.
3. Note that the gang and police were fully aware one of their prey had been behind bars for (pathetic, and some laughable) offences before. Which the gang believed would assist them, in not only putting the person away for the maximum sentence, but had stated that the person would be coming back out of prison ‘in a box’. There was not only one instance of this type of heinous expectation by the gang and police.
Whilst it was accepted amongst some of the prey that there was nil chance of any charges standing, much less any chance of any of them going to prison, the prey had been made aware that there were extremely bent police, IT experts and hackers amongst the gang, which caused considerable concern. Especially at the time when Sonia Poulton told her gang that her ‘case’ was going nowhere, and that she needed the gang to dig deeper for information on her prey, and gang members were found to be fabricating ‘evidence’ and changing wordings and dates of posts and tweets. It is now known that warnings filtered through to the gang, and such blatant pcj was prevented. (This being months prior to the kangaroo being set up by London Met police.) Although it is known some of the most dangerous hench men had ‘software’ to use which was infallible. Fortunately for them, they did not get a chance to try and use this material. Unfortunate for the prey though. Who wanted to see it appear in court. lol
Whilst the majority of the public who commit crimes should rightly be in fear of being sent to prison, given the gangland hierarchies and general state of the UK prison system, the public should be aware and equally afraid of bent police taking them into custody for interviews or a ‘chat’. Especially when those arrested know they are innocent, and also know the police arresting them know them to be innocent. Fortunately for some prey, they were tipped off months in advance to prepare for arrest, and police were informed of such. It is still unknown why this was not directly conveyed to London Met police to prevent them causing harm…
The below link goes some way in explaining that whether a person is guilty or innocent, some human bodies and brains are unable to cope with the despicable behaviour and archaic methods of questioning during interview.
Be fully aware whilst reading the below, that some police are so dangerously warped, they will arrest people KNOWING they have no evidence to make an arrest. Sometimes hiding video footage which would prove people are innocent. Until they have got their jollies from humiliating their prey.
All power to Sir Mark Rowley, for setting a precedent to finally start blasting all bent police into orbit.
https://policeconduct.gov.uk/deaths-during-or-following-police-contact-statistics-england-and-wales-2020-21
Rory Port on December 14, 2022 at 1:24 pm
“Be fully aware whilst reading the below, that some police are so dangerously warped, they will arrest people KNOWING they have no evidence to make an arrest. Sometimes hiding video footage which would prove people are innocent. Until they have got their jollies from humiliating their prey.
All power to Sir Mark Rowley, for setting a precedent to finally start blasting all bent police into orbit.”
Hear, hear! Especially for all police who know their underlings have committed crimes against persons whom they have investigated, and whom they had all proof was entirely innocent prior to arrest.
Senior police finding a bent cop in their ranks would usually have a word in the ear of the bent underling cop and tell said underling to gtfo of policing before they are sacked.
Quite how bent would any police have to be to collude and conspire to assist in burying vital evidence which would instantly clear an accused person? How much more bent would their seniors have to be to allow their underlings to do this?
Evidence which in some cases, could literally mean the difference between life and death of a man whom police know to be entirely innocent, but you are forced by police to watch police continuing to graft towards having the falsely accused banged up in a violent prison environment.
No cop of any rank is unaware that there is an element in prison society whom although they themselves may have murdered or battered people to within an inch of their life, will prey on men coming into prison who have been sentenced for even the very slightest crimes against women. This is how the underbelly of the prison system works. The police know this, and were informed of such. In case they pretended not to know.
Therefore, it is not only Sonia Poulton’s gang who knew some of their innocent prey would end up ‘on the numbers’ wing, if they were given custodial sentences for the false allegations of ‘stalking and harassment’, the police also knew it.
Have a think about this.
Your son, your husband, your father, your grandfather, your brother, your grandson, your nephew, your cousin, your uncle, your friend, your neighbour, or perhaps someone you do not even know at all, or know of them only by name, may be falsely accused of verbally or physically attacking, raping, beating, stalking, harassing or stealing from a woman.
You and the police know the person is entirely innocent of the charges, and you have all the evidence which will clear the falsely accused immediately, and before his name can be spread throughout msm and social media.
But you are forced to watch bent police destroy, ignore or hide that vital evidence from the cps. Watching them charge a falsely accused person with the most heinous crimes known to man. Then you find you are also put under threat not to use lawyers or otherwise set that evidence before the cps.
After waiting months or years for a court date to be set, the falsely accused goes to pre trial. They are under extreme threat, and you are also under increasing threat from bent police and extremely dangerous gang-stalkers. For simply wishing to provide the vital evidence which would clear the accused, prove police corruption, bring a halt to the trial, and have all the real perpetrators charged and brought to trials.
All the while, you know that should the police corruption be allowed to continue, the accused is watching the clock, and looking at possibly living ‘on the numbers’ wing because of gang-stalking false allegators.
tbc.
Rory Port on December 14, 2022 at 1:24 pm:
“Whilst it was accepted amongst some of the prey that there was nil chance of any charges standing, much less any chance of any of them going to prison, the prey had been made aware that there were extremely bent police, IT experts and hackers amongst the gang, which caused considerable concern. Especially at the time when Sonia Poulton told her gang that her ‘case’ was going nowhere, and that she needed the gang to dig deeper for information on her prey, and gang members were found to be fabricating ‘evidence’ and changing wordings and dates of posts and tweets.”
This would have been around the time they were deleting their accounts on social media and getting rid of sims and their ‘burner phones’. Forcing some of them to use public wifi places to post their threats from. At the same point in time when Sonia Poulton was making another pretence about being ‘hacked’, and needing to hide her Kenneth Clarke ‘project’, and all her correspondence concerned with him and other politicians’ most personal details etc. All of whom she alleges to have ‘proof’ of their paedophilia. Alleging to be in possession of personal and ‘police witness statements’ from people who had been abused during childhood, or raped in adulthood. (Esther Baker not being one of those who had given her any statements. To clear this up before it starts. Whatever Esther Baker may or may not have told her since December 2015 was not in SP’s possession previously. Esther Baker was not ‘handled’ by Sonia Poulton, and was not on her list of ‘abused people to interview’. )
Actor Tom Cruise was another target. Due to evidence supplied to her via her ‘contacts in the film world’. Almost everything about each of her targets was alleged to be backed up her ‘police contacts’. Alleging that she had police contacts, and also alleging others in the gang had police relatives who supply confidential data. One gang member who made contact with police to make false allegations about the gang’s prey, is alleged to have a father who was in the police whom she alleges to have used to ‘threaten’ people on her behalf. (This is confirmed by other gang members in threats.) We should not dismiss this abuse of power out of hand. Since one of her gang’s prey has evidence of police colluding with ‘journalists with regard to himself from decades ago. So we do know this corrupt behaviour is not new. This being due to him having been congratulated by judges for the evidence he gave in child abuse inquiries into staff treatment of children in N Wales. Which eventually caused all UK councils to start pulling their socks up and providing actual care for children. Simple stuff, such as feeding the resident children properly, instead of taking the food home for their own families. Allowing children to have regular showers and baths. Children began to have a voice. Which put up the cost of insurance. Due to children finally being allowed to complain about evil staff beating the sh*t out of them, and raping them…
[Removed at request of poster]
@Rory Port and @Sue Themall apparently we are all the same person according to the resident moronic troll on Twitter.
Aww bless, it is exceptionally unoriginal, boring and very, very stupid for one person to be wrongly blamed for everyone else and everything.
Resident troll clearly wants to give an amoeba a run for it’s money in the number of brain cells counting challenge. I think the amoeba would win tbh.
For clarity as I’m not Echo it would have been better if I’d phrased the last sentence of my above post “Echo, I hope you are okay now”
SvT on December 14, 2022 at 8:11 pm said:
@Rory Port and @Sue Themall apparently we are all the same person according to the resident moronic troll on Twitter.
The pretence not to know who is really who and how many socks people are allegedly using and where they are posting, is such old hat. A method originally used by Sonia Poulton and her ‘team outlaw’ gang against their prey. And we all know the results and conclusion of that…
Which is why it is puzzling to see someone continuing to torture and harm Sonia Poulton’s and her gang’s prey, by using names and personal data to humiliate them. It is not only dangerous behaviour, it will have serious repercussions further down the line for all the other gang members currently keeping their heads down. Due to them all once posting alongside said poster in the past, and all their tweets being saved.
The problem regarding who is who, could be cleared up for them by police in an instant, should they wish to tell Sonia Poulton, or one of the other dangerous gang-stalkers to start contacting the police to make some more false allegations.
The London Met police would be my personal choice to contact. They having ‘investigated’ each of those falsely accused by Sonia Poulton and her gang-stalking associates, and knowing for a fact none of their prey had committed any of the crimes they were falsely accused of, and having discovered that none of the falsely accused knew each other even slightly, they may be able to assist them and explain nobody’s wife or partner was ever involved in posting, and that the falsely accused were not in any ‘gang’ together, as was dangerously alleged by Sonia Poulton and each of the hench men in her gang who lied to police. The London Met police will still be able to access all evidence and statements made to police, lawyers, cps, and latterly senior cps, regarding Sonia Poulton and her dangerous gang members.
All of whom are evidenced by the victims and witnesses as engaging in multiple joint enterprises, where they conspired to harm, and caused harm, to silence their prey.
It is noted none of Sonia Poulton’s gang are engaging with aforesaid dangerous poster. Their attention-seeking is not good for the gang at this time. It may be that they wish more of the gang’s names and crimes to be placed here. It isn’t out of the question, and will be happening. No rush. Court first, for some of them…
The bedtime read in this link may assist the poster as to why they should stfu. Or not, as the case may be. The people they are causing the most harm for with their current behaviour, are Sonia Poulton and her ‘team outlaw’ gang.
Everything stated here is the truth and has been sworn under oath. So they can take that to the bank…
exposinghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conspiracy
Courts have said train strikes are no excuse for accused people not to appear in court. Which means accused people would be forced to travel hundreds of miles by bus or coach if civil actions were to begin before the train strikes end. If they could get a seat that is. Or they would have to use Shanks’s pony. What a nuisance this would be in freezing weather.
It seems like it was only last week when gang-stalkers were laughing their heads off that falsely accused people and witnesses were forced to travel hundreds of miles into London for kangaroo courts set up by the London Met police. Travelling overnight in some cases. To avoid traffic delays and to find suitable parking. It was a mild Spring back then. Not a freezing cold Winter. Brrr…
The distance some people will be having to travel to answer for their crimes is quite far, to very far when you look at a map.
And the courts are absolutely ruthless in their questioning about sickness when people send ‘sick notes’.
Just saying…
Caroline Farrow
@CF_Farrow
Scotland has passed the Abolition of Women bill. #GenderRecognitionReformBill
3:50 PM · Dec 22, 2022
👀👀👀
Do not panic. This has not been fact-checked. We have been here before. We are aware that some of the self proclaimed ‘thoroughly heterosexual women’ will use the most ridiculously emotive headlines and sound bites to attract attention to themselves and their ’causes’.
Indeed, the same type of ‘thoroughly heterosexual women’ have been seen and heard stating on tv that they should have the right to be naked in public places. That it is not at all their responsibility if they cause sexual arousal in people passing by. That people of all ages should ‘learn to control’ any such arousal…
For countless years, the public have been led to falsely believe homosexual males and cross-dressers are the most likely individuals to be paedophiles and rapists. For the past ten years, the public has been treading a previously worn out route into falsely believing Parliament is run by paedophiles for paedophiles, and that the bodies of hundreds, if not thousands of abused children and adolescents will be found buried in the grounds of the homes of some of the wealthiest families in the UK.
People who have been led to believe this, are known to have packed themselves a picnic, and journeyed in convoy to such properties. Armed with spades and shovels. Some of them have been arrested. Mainly because they are a f*cking nuisance, and can cause traffic and litter problems in quiet, leafy areas.
For the past few years, trans people have been put in the frame where bame and homosexuals once were, and in some cases, and in some towns and cities, and in some countries, still are.
Don’t be a bigot or associate with bigots. Be aware that people and children of all sexes and genders are generally most at risk from their families and people who know them, or from sick individuals and gangs of lying fantasists and bigots. Therefore, it is highly improbable that ‘women will be abolished’ in the near future by governments. Despite all the rumours.
Everyone knows of someone who has had their teeth capped, or had a nose job or boob job to enhance their appearance, and to give them the confidence to get through their life. Some may know people with prosthetic limbs or hands which do not function. If it makes the person feel more at ease with themselves in public, which of the current bigots would argue with them or the nhs for providing prosthetic limbs?
Not one of the ‘handful’ of people who read this ‘obscure blog’ would sit down in a room with Cher or her son Chas and use such bigotry as we are seeing on social media. So stfu.
Interesting.
Caroline is nothing if not hyperbolic!
That said, I agree with her that the bill is ill-considered and wrong. Such a shame that this awful woman has become so associated with a valid point of view.
Agree this Bill has not been properly thought through.
Public toilets and changing rooms have always been potentially risky and dangerous places for people of all genders and age groups since Adam was a lad. School toilets and changing rooms being as potentially dangerous as nightclub toilets with regard to people being threatened or assaulted.
Now is the time to acknowledge the UK as a whole should be making these areas safer, by employing people to not only start keeping areas hygienic, but to also guard the people using the spaces.
It need only be as simple as can already be seen in the more upmarket hotels. Someone sits at a table (which has been bolted to the floor) behind a vase of fresh cut flowers (or wipe-clean flowers) and keeps an eye on who uses the space; watches how the space is being used and for what; how long the person or group stays in the space; and the manner of people when they leave.
Toilet attendants are considered important by businesses who value their customers. Nobody wants to see a piece of paper hanging on a toilet cubicle wall, where a box has been ticked, advising them that the toilet is checked by staff every half hour or an hour. This is enough time for someone to slip in pee or vomit, or for a cubicle-user to die from a heart attack. Within half an hour or an hour, a drug user could die from taking a bad drug. It is also enough time for a trans person or any other person to bleed to death after being assaulted.
We have to recognise that whilst some sick, violent people will take advantage of the new legislation, we could use preventive measures by not continuing to do things on the cheap. Would also add, for the same reasons, we need to bring back bus conductors and have in-carriage train guards. Relying on cameras and robots will never be as reliable as trained, salaried people being in situ.