In May this year, parts of Sonia Poulton’s case involving former Liberal MP John Hemming were struck out by a High Court Deputy Master – Irena Sabic – because they contradicted her previous witness statement – we said as dishonest lies. However, she succeeded in preserving other parts of her case, which she portrayed as a complete victory in the case as opposed to merely mitigating her losses in a procedural skirmish. The net costs payment was £3,850 against her. In particular Ms Poulton said that my appeal was refused. This was highly misleading – permission to appeal had only been refused by the original judge and Poulton knew an appeal was being pursued. In due course, as per the order shown below, that permission was granted by a higher court. The hearing was listed for 23rd October 2024 at the High Court in London, today. There has been not a whisper of this from Sonia Poulton, which in itself highly misleads her followers and donors.
In May a High Court Judge has struck out a critical part of Sonia Poulton’s Defence and ordered costs against her. Ms Poulton claimed this was a victory because part of her pleadings survived, and misleadingly claimed my appeal was refused. In fact permission was granted and it is being heard today.
Here is Ms Poulton’s X post (archive):
Poulton misleads her followers and donors by claiming complete victory and a refusal of my appeal.
Here is the truth in the form of the order of High Court Judge Mrs Justice Steyn DBE:
Contrary to Ms Poulton’s misleading statements permission was granted and the appeal is today. Whoever wins, Poulton’s honesty and integrity cannot be trusted.
Ms Poulton’s statements, as ever, were not to be relied upon. She knew full well that the first instance appeal refusal is not final and I could ask the higher court – the Deputy Master said I could in the remote hearing which Poulton attended.
I’ve rather given up on trying to warn conspiracy theorists – including those in Ms Poulton’s “cult” because I’ve had scant luck doing so in the past. People have to learn the hard way, sadly.
If I was cop involved in investigating any matters at all concerning Sonia Poulton lying, spinning yarns, and hoodwinking her flock and the general public one way or another, I would bear in mind she has form for lying to courts. Anyone who will lie in front of a judge, knowing they could go to prison for it, will lie to anyone about anything.
How many times is someone allowed to get away with telling blatant lies in an English court before they are incarcerated for a long time? Would extra prison time be added on, for someone like her who has continued to lie since the first occasions she had it pointed out to her that she had lied, and could be imprisoned for doing so? It isn’t as if she doesn’t know she’s doing it.
And as for her deliberately quoting judges out of context from time to time, to make herself look believable to her flock, I think a lot of extra prison time should be added on for this alone. It’s skewed, and hoodwinks her flock and the general public.
It is notable that mainstream and fringe journalists known to Sonia Poulton for decades, have avoided all of her court cases like the plague. No public words of encouragement. Of course, it is known that those who may have had something to say, have already been dealt with by various courts 😃 Probably chunnering away in the background about their ‘oppression’…
Ilie Myassovalot on October 24, 2024 at 2:32 pm said: “Of course, it is known that those who may have had something to say, have already been dealt with by various courts 😃 Probably chunnering away in the background about their ‘oppression’…”
😃 By all accounts, the fines and costs, and ‘donations to charities of their choice’ etc, has cost the ‘oppressed’ a small fortune. Others involved along the way, and who have yet to see the inside of a court regarding their own participation in perpetuating myths and false allegations, should take heed, and start saving up. Or set up something like a buymeacoffee account – but which shouldn’t be a buymeacoffee acccount.
ie. Due to buymeacoffee having fallen foul of Sonia Poulton due to one thing and another, which she has never made absolutely clear to the public at large, buymeacoffee was ‘cancelled’ by her flock. Some of whom probably regret making their hasty decisions to cut off a source of easy income.
May God bless and save people from Sonia Poulton’s wickedness! It is outrageous of her to attack the memory of all those who were murdered and maimed in Manchester, as if they didn’t exist beyond being a name on a list in an “official narrative” drummed up by the secret services.
This is what she had to say on her ‘breakfast show’ regarding Hibbert v Hall:
“This will be for remedies on the harassment case determination of liability remedies on the data protection claim and costs. So there you go, A VERY LOUD ESTABLISHMENT WARNING SHOT HAS BEEN SENT OUT TO ANYONE ELSE WHO WANTS TO QUESTION OFFICIAL NARRATIVES. WHICH OBVIOUSLY INCLUDES ME AND THAT IS THE REALITY. I make no comment one way or another.”
😵💫😵💫😵💫 👮👮♀️👨⚖️
God bless us and save us! Sonia Poulton and one of her guests were talking about ‘sexual fetishes’ on her ‘breakfast show’ today, so they were. I’d not heard of coprophilia before, so I looked it up.
🫨
It isn’t something you would expect to be hearing about on a ‘breakfast show’. Especially not at half-term. Whilst most children will have breakfasted at a more normal time of day, some of her flock’s children will have been breakfasting an hour or so before lunch-time, and may have heard some of the shocking stuff I heard.