Last week I was interested to read an article by Doctor Louise Moody, which linked to uploads of legal letters she had sent claiming I had broken the law by serving ‘court documents’ on her. Not least, because forwarding an email with unsigned draft documents is not service (Bar Standards Board v O’Connor (a Barrister) [2012] 17th August, Visitors to the Inns of Court at 33) and if it is, recent case law states that McKenzie Friends are permitted to effect service for their clients, because solicitors use unqualified process servers all the time (Ndole Assets Ltd v Designer M&E Services UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2865, 67). She has now removed these allegations and settled with Simon.
The allegations were very serious, and amounted to an allegation I have committed a criminal offence, which Mr Just abetted and procured. After these cases were pointed out to her, she has now settled and removed the allegations, including agreeing with Mr Just never to repeat them, nor to mention him at all save to rebut allegations by third parties.
I add that I hope this matter is at an end because leaving aside this strange incident, I agree in large part with Moody on the issues of transgender identity. I feel that Doctor Harrop, the GP whose conduct was at issue in the online debate that apparently prompted all this, should have been struck off not just suspended. His conduct was far worse than Barbara Hewson’s. I take the view that drunkenly publicly swearing at your regulator as Hewson did is a slapped wrist / warning / week suspension offence.
However, in the Harrop case the GMC found,
“The tribunal considered that Dr Harrop’s actions in posting inappropriate tweets over a sustained period of time, in contradiction to the advice he was given, breached fundamental tenets of the profession.
His actions brought the profession into disrepute, undermining public confidence in the profession and the standards of conduct expected from members of the profession.”
It is amazing how many SJW ‘transgender allies’ and ‘male feminists’ turn out to engage in inappropriate or creepy behaviours. They seem to feel their beliefs justify anything up to and including stalking (that is not to say Harrop’s behaviour amounted to stalking, albeit it was found to be improper).
I would like to add again that I do not condone the @ReporterLAL account. I do agree with some of the observations and some of the, ‘victims’ clearly provoked matters but even so some of the @ReporterLAL account’s tweets I do not agree with and I distance myself from it, as does Mr Just. I expressly do not condone the comments about Dr Moody’s deceased partner.
Wow! It is so generous of you not to ask for money and just to let this foolish vulnerable woman take down her posts.
The link parked below is already being seen as quite a sphincter squeezer.
Possibly because it is a reminder to those who conspired to harm and who caused actual harm, that long dreaded cases are to be brought this year.
Deep pockets will be necessary. Whilst arrests are expected and inevitable, some people may wish to seek legal advice regarding considering settlements before more letters are served.
All complaints made to police by the genuine victims and complainants involved are to be reviewed by police.
Police promises to be thorough have been taken with a pinch of salt. Due to police lying in the past.
Therefore, every lie told to police is under investigation by victims and lawyers. Police to investigate further during review. Said police will not be the same corrupt and prejudiced police who accepted the lies of false allegators without doing any investigations whatsoever.
ie. Not the same police (still protected) who threatened genuine victims in their own homes because those victims refused to collude with them in staying silent to pervert and obstruct the course of justice, and enable false allegators to have innocents incarcerated.
False allegators involved in the original conspiracies to harm innocent people are still being protected by the police, and police are continuing to withhold evidence from each other which would bring about prosecutions and prevent further harm.
This is allowing more people to be groomed into believing false allegations and piling onto specific targets.
Some people have denied knowing they were (and continue to be) involved in an orchestrated campaign to prevent people reporting crime and giving evidence to bring the original perpetrators to court. Police are fully aware of this and have all names and crimes on their databases.
That the police still deliberately choose not to act against the perpetrators is also subject to review. Police have made a large task for themselves and for lawyers. Not least made more difficult because of perpetrators disappearing or laying low, and police hiding evidence of their own collusion in matters.
Senior Met police detectives have had access to all evidence necessary. Some of which is the same evidence they hid from the Crown when people gave evidence of police colluding with liars and fantasists in the framing of innocent people.
The most recent incidents on social media are glaring proof that when targets are marked out by a group of false allegators who do not fear prosecution, the targets are left at serious risk of the same false allegations being used against them by the original false allegators and those whom they groom into their circles year after year. There is some pretence that these gangs “fight for the rights of abused children and women”. For which no concrete evidence has ever been found.
The lies told on social media and to the police during synchronised false complaint campaigns and vendettas are overwhelming in volume.
Evidence of police collusion is rife.
Proof of which is held not only by the victims, but by the police themselves. Bundles of it.
Prime evidence withheld from the cps during a notoriously corrupt Met investigation in 2016 is only the tip of the iceberg.
That any police officer would wish to continue framing innocent people by hiding evidence and consulting people on how they could arrest people without having any evidence against them whatsoever, is a grave matter indeed. Still being protected. Nobody who knows about it can believe it.
The manner in which the data of innocent people was obtained by police and how this data was managed is mind blowing for victims and lawyers alike.
Those involved in the violent attacks on targeted individuals during the past decade have every right to believe themselves to be protected by the police. The police have been shown to have co-operated with the gang every step of the way, and have consistently failed to arrest and charge them for making false allegations, death threats and threats to maim etc. whenever it was reported.
Despite having all the evidence to bring charges and assist in having the perpetrators incarcerated to protect the public.
Blame can be laid at the door of the police for the suffering caused to wives and families of VIPs and innocent members of the public who have had to watch their loved ones going to early graves.
Knowing their names will be splattered across social media alongside false allegations of paedophilia or paedophile protection for the rest of time.
Carl Beech was reported to police when it was found he was plagiarising from every book written by survivors and fanatasists. There were concerns regarding the number of nhs workers and charities who were latching onto him to give him credence.
Police refused to act on intelligence provided.
It is accepted some people were truly taken in by Carl Beech. It is not accepted that most others were beguiled by him. Quite the opposite. They knew he was lying but he suited their purpose. To use Beech (and other fantasists) as a conduit in a press and social media fuelled campaign to “expose paedophiles in Parliament”.
Living under the constant threat of being arrested, and learning the police will be knocking on doors with PINs or sending them via email without first investigating the known false complainants takes its toll. People became sick and died with the stress.
Police were previously warned that they would be inveigled into issuing PINs and cautions and making false arrests for the sole purpose of allowing journalists to further humiliate their victims on social media, by naming them legally. The ultimate humiliation.
The police deliberately allowed this to happen. In some proven instances, journalists and gang members were told by police whose homes the police were about to raid.
It is galling for the victims left suffering injustice. This has given the gangs all the confidence they need to continue endangering lives and livelihoods. See twitter etc.
Shame on every police officer involved who failed to act and is still failing to act. Not one of them is worth a day’s pay.
The public have only had a brief glimpse of the police’ vile and corrupt behaviour to suppress evidence which could have prevented false allegations being made against prominent people and those who have exposed one of the UK’s biggest politically motivated scams.
No thanks to journalists, police, nhs and greedy solicitors who tour prisons and probation hostels for clients, many genuine victims of csa, rape and violence will find the road to justice more difficult than ever before.
When the false allegators have finally been prosecuted, others planning on lying to the police about stalking and harassment or rape and abuse, may think twice before phoning the police for a friend.
Transcripts of the lies told to police about genuine victims are available. Alongside evidence of the warnings given to police where they were told dates to expect synchronised phone calls from named false allegators and what had been planned to say.
People new to trolling and stalking and harassment should perhaps find out who they are mixing with, and how dangerous they are.
https://trollexposure.wordpress.com/2022/01/07/think-before-you-post-online/
The police and gang members involved in making false allegations and fabricating evidence to have someone arrested who was dealing with the brutal murder of a disabled person should have the book thrown at them.
Talk about kicking a man when he’s down. The police knew the victims they were harassing hadn’t been on the internet for months and one had had only one social media account. Not the dozens of accounts they were accused of having. It all came out in the wash. Hope something is being done. All involved must be prosecuted and pay for the consequences.
Too right the police should be ashamed of themselves. Lazy policing and detective work has ruined lives, killed off several elderly and not so elderly people, and cost the country millions.
Carl Beech and company are leaving a lot of unanswered questions for the next batch of self-styled ‘paedo hunters’ to ask circa 2032.
‘Journalists’ already having made it clear to their followers that Beech was given a harsh sentence as an example of as a warning to people to back off from ‘exposing paedophiles in Parliament’. Ffs. On it goes…
That moment, when journalists with thousands of followers suddenly delete all their tweets blaming the [redacted] for financing all the evil in the world.
After having assured their followers they had proof to back up such statements.
Awkward…
[Edited by MHN]
Long before the obscene, predatory London Met police were found to be harassing and framing victims and witnesses in collusion with ‘journalists’ and their gangs of accomplices, it was already known that provincial police had all the evidence needed to arrest and charge the journalists and gang members involved in dangerous attempts to cause political instability by destroying the reputations of innocent VIPs and household names.
Members of the public warned police that a journalists-led scam regarding a ‘paedophile panic’ was in operation, and coming to a town or city near them.
Which it did.
Lives were ruined or lost altogether whilst police chose to sit around sucking up the lies told to them in synch by gangs of false allegators.
Stories about police chiefs smashing up their own mobile phones, or the bbc being tipped off and sending a helicopter to film police raiding a celebrity’s home, or even Carl Beech having a journalist accompany him to police interviews, will seem quite normal when the whole truth emerges about how the last decade’s ‘paedophile panic’ was set up, and how the journalists-led gangs set about destroying people.
Parliamentarians, people in the entertainment industry, and members of the public who had been in care as children and who disputed the outrageous and dangerous claims made by said journalists, became targets of gangs on social media.
Material evidence of the original scam was not only hidden and ignored by London Met police in their last ditch efforts to have people falsely convicted, it was also hidden and withheld by provincial police who had been given every opportunity to arrest the gangs and stop the persecution of innocent people.
Further proof of this was found in an inspector’s letter to a victim. Wherein the inspector admits to the precise number of officers found to have lied, withheld evidence, pcj etc, etc, etc. Those officers having cost the country tens of millions of pounds in wasted police time. More to come regarding this grave matter at a more appropriate time.
That the London Met police or any other police still strive to cover up for extremely dangerous, corrupt police within their ranks is alarming. Though according to all recent reports, this is not at all uncommon.
Daily reports of bent police being convicted of rape, paedophilia, gbh, abh, fraud, falsifying records, fitting people up and corruption, could lead some people into believing there are more poachers than gamekeepers within the police at this time.
To be clear: A person turning a blind eye to corruption is corrupt. Not reporting bent colleagues for hiding and destroying evidence is corrupt.
Police turned a blind eye to Wayne Couzens’ behaviour.
Victims of London Met police have evidence of other police behaving similarly, and covering up some of the most bent behaviour imaginable.
The risks some London Met police will take in order to spend a few days driving around the countryside is astonishing.
That the London Met and provincial police are still maintaining cover for corrupt police, in full knowledge that the witnesses and victims were aware of their corruption at every stage, and were reporting it to police and legal teams to prevent police causing more danger to victims and witnesses, is further proof the police believe themselves above the law, and will not oust predatory officers within their ranks without legal intervention.
NWP held all the keys to the matter set out in the video below. They held evidence with IDs of all those involved in the cabal and their rôles within it.
It should be noted the police did not ask the cabal for evidence to back up the dangerous allegations made against their quarry.
It was demonstrated by Wigan and NW police that only the names of some people were enough for police to make arrests. Those men having previously been guests of Her Majesty.
Wigan and NW police had no business making arrests on the say so of journalist-led gangs.
They allowed their own prejudice to make arrests simply because some people were ‘known’ to them.
The gangs have made phone calls to police about people without criminal records, and the police made zero attempts to make contact with those people. Though the false allegations made were of similar weight to those made about the person in the video below.
His family woke up to find a dozen police dressed in riot gear, behaving like they had seen too many films.
NW police would have known how completely unnecessary it was to send riot police to this address.
They also knew the ages of everyone in the household.
A young child was in the home.
More on this area of the vendetta at a more appropriate time, as police were given evidence regarding the severe risk to the family in this case, but continued to fail to protect them.
The people arrested in these cases were actually victims of the people who had been making false allegations about them to the police.
One was falsely accused of storing child abuse images. The police raided his home. Nothing found. Police had been previously warned to expect the hoax calls on several occasions. They failed to act.
By all accounts, it is known the police involved had relished dressing up in riot gear to drag these innocent victims and witnesses from their homes. Trashing their possessions whilst family members looked on in terror.
Some people lost their homes, businesses and life savings after false allegations were made.
Completely innocent people were left on endless bail to keep them silent whilst police made the most frantic and dangerous efforts to hide data breaches and evidence which would assist the Defence.
All proof of which is held by police and victims and pasted throughout social media by the gangs themselves. (Should this be disputed.)
Police were repeatedly warned they were acting on false allegations made in synch by a group of individuals whose background checks alone would have prevented all false warrants and arrests.
Most gang members were already known to police. Those unknown to them, are now known to them. Though some were found not to be known to police by the names they gave to police when making false allegations.
Police methods of collecting and recording ‘evidence’ about the victims and witnesses will probably be used in future London Met training videos about how not to be a bent cop. More to come on this when appropriate.
Police lied to the court about innocent victims accessing blogs which they could not possibly have accessed.
Police bragged about how they would drag people out of their homes. Police were found to have discussed waiting for certain colleagues to be on leave before dragging people from their homes.
Investigations are underway to discover whether this was to scotch blame and prevent scrutiny into previous crime reports which police knew had been swept under the carpet by other corrupt police. Complaints and warnings about the matter were made to police, solicitors, barristers and CPS.
The evidence of police being bent enough to admit they would arrest the victims of heinous crimes without any evidence against them at all, is not a matter for Cressida Dick alone. It is also a matter for several other police chiefs who have failed to oust the corrupt and prejudiced police in their own ranks.
Evidence of all the above was supplied to several provincial police lest any police continued to withhold evidence which was destroying the lives of the victims and those supporting them.
The DPA breaches by the police are on a scale unseen before due to the number of police involved. The video below is only the tip of the iceberg.
Fortunately, bent cops tend to flock together or recognise each other otherwise. Which perhaps explains certain matters concerning some victims of the London Met police and other lazy police who colluded with false allegators to put innocent people behind bars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Neh-wBKqEvY
Prior to the obscene and predatory behaviour of London Met police who harassed, intimidated and framed victims and witnesses in collusion with ‘journalists’ and their gangs of accomplices, who make dangerous attempts to cause political instability via the destruction of the reputations of innocent people, it was known that provincial police had all the evidence needed to arrest the ‘journalists’ and gang members involved.
Lives have been ruined or lost altogether whilst police sat around sucking up the lies told to them in synch by gangs of false allegators.
Material evidence given to police by genuine victims and witnesses was not only ignored, but hidden. Not only hidden from court, but also withheld and hidden from police by police.
That the London Met police or any other police still strive to cover up for extremely dangerous, corrupt police within their ranks is alarming. Though according to recent reports, this is not at all uncommon.
Daily reports of bent police being convicted of rape, paedophilia, fraud and corruption could lead people into believing there are more poachers than gamekeepers within the police at this time.
To be clear: Turning a blind eye to corruption is also corrupt.
That the London Met and provincial police are still maintaining cover for corrupt police, in full knowledge that the witnesses and victims were aware of their corruption at every stage, and were reporting it to police 0d solicitors to prevent police from causing any more danger to victims and witnesses, is further proof the police will not oust predatory officers within their ranks without legal intervention.
NWP held all the keys to a certain matter set out in the video below. Supporters of the victim gave evidence with IDs of all those involved in the cabal and their rôles within it.
It should be noted the police did not ask the cabal for evidence to back up the dangerous allegations they made against their quarry.
The manipulation of police by police is demonstrated to be barely secondary to the manipulation of police by the false allegators. Which begs questions. Police supposedly the upholders of the law and all…
By all accounts, it is known the police relished dressing up in riot gear to drag innocent victims and witnesses from their homes. Trashing their possessions whilst family members looked on in terror.
Completely innocent people were left on seemingly endless bail whilst police made the most frantic and dangerous efforts to fabricate evidence
to justify data breaches and false warrants to silence people and prevent them contacting each other.
All proof of which is held by police and victims should there be any dispute.
Police were repeatedly warned they were acting on false allegations made in synch by a group of individuals whose background checks alone would have prevented all false warrants and arrests.
Most gang members were already known to have criminal records; violent tendencies; sex fantasists; drug and alcohol problems; mental health problems etc.
Should police encounter difficulty in accessing this information, the victims would provide names of the police who had been informed of same.
Police have effectively stolen private property and devices at the behest of false allegators, in sad attempts to prevent witnesses having evidence to defend themselves at trial. Like that was ever likely to happen. The victims already knew how the police were rolling.
Their methods of collecting evidence about the victims and witnesses will probably be used in future London Met training videos about how not to be a bent cop. More to come on this.
Police lied to the court about innocent victims accessing blogs which they could not possibly have accessed.
Police bragged about how they would drag people out of their homes and at what time of day. Police were found to have discussed waiting for certain officials to be on holiday before dragging people from their homes.
Presumably to scotch blame and prevent scrutiny into previous crime reports which they knew had been swept under the carpet by other corrupt police. Complaints and warnings about this were made to police and solicitors, barristers and CPS.
The evidence of police being so bent they wanted to arrest the victims and witnesses of heinous crimes without any evidence against them at all, is not a matter for Cressida Dick alone. It is also a matter for several other police chiefs who have failed to seed out the corrupt and prejudiced police in their ranks.
The DPA breaches by police are on a scale unseen before.
Same evidence was also supplied to various provincial police lest any continued to hide the evidence which was destroying the lives of the victims and those supporting them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Neh-wBKqEvY