“Project Nightwatch / @PNWNET” Removes Materials After Police Contact – Police Apologise – It Was Not Simon Just

The Twitter / x.com account @PNWNet, along with an associated WordPress blog, mordred8.wordpress.com have been removed by their owner. MHN can exclusively reveal this followed police intervention combined with MHN beginning formal civil legal processes to unmask the account operator. Police have also looked into the allegation it is Simon Just and apologised to him in writing. Provided the @PNWNet successor(s) on Bluesky and elsewhere do not draw me into their dramas again, that is the end of the matter from my perspective. Other anonymous account operators should take note.

Police apologised to Simon Just over false allegations he operates Project Nightwatch.

Police apologised to Simon Just over false allegations he operates Project Nightwatch. They were then given the information to contact the real owner, which coincided with, shortly thereafter, the @PNWNet, ‘X’ account and an associated blog being removed.

The so-called, “Project Nightwatch” account(s) on X, WordPress and elsewhere have been of growing concern to MHN and police for some time. There is a court case going on in the Sussex area. Police are properly anxious it not be disrupted by imprudent posts. I was separately concerned about being drawn into dramas that have nothing to do with me. After a number of warnings online, I stopped making public comment and quietly started real-world legal process, serving Enix Limited, which hosts the project, with a pre-action letter and draft court papers.

Continue reading

Share Button

The Court Hearing Sonia Poulton Does Not Want You to Know About

In May this year, parts of Sonia Poulton’s case involving former Liberal MP John Hemming were struck out by a High Court Deputy Master – Irena Sabic – because they contradicted her previous witness statement – we said as dishonest lies. However, she succeeded in preserving other parts of her case, which she portrayed as a complete victory in the case as opposed to merely mitigating her losses in a procedural skirmish. The net costs payment was £3,850 against her. In particular Ms Poulton said that my appeal was refused. This was highly misleading – permission to appeal had only been refused by the original judge and Poulton knew an appeal was being pursued. In due course, as per the order shown below, that permission was granted by a higher court. The hearing was listed for 23rd October 2024 at the High Court in London, today. There has been not a whisper of this from Sonia Poulton, which in itself highly misleads her followers and donors.

Sonia Poulton Video Statement

In May a High Court Judge has struck out a critical part of Sonia Poulton’s Defence and ordered costs against her. Ms Poulton claimed this was a victory because part of her pleadings survived, and misleadingly claimed my appeal was refused. In fact permission was granted and it is being heard today.

Here is Ms Poulton’s X post (archive):

Poulton misleads her followers and donors by claiming complete victory and a refusal of my appeal.

Poulton misleads her followers and donors by claiming complete victory and a refusal of my appeal.

Here is the truth in the form of the order of High Court Judge Mrs Justice Steyn DBE:

Contrary to Ms Poulton's misleading statements permission was granted and the appeal is today. Whoever wins, Poulton's honesty and integrity cannot be trusted.

Contrary to Ms Poulton’s misleading statements permission was granted and the appeal is today. Whoever wins, Poulton’s honesty and integrity cannot be trusted.

Ms Poulton’s statements, as ever, were not to be relied upon. She knew full well that the first instance appeal refusal is not final and I could ask the higher court – the Deputy Master said I could in the remote hearing which Poulton attended.

Share Button