Esther Baker owes me money. On 3rd November 2020 Master Lisa Sullivan in the High Court ordered her to pay me £1,226.80 (order uploaded for transparency) and also struck out parts of her defence to my claim for libel and harassment. Predictably, Baker has been sniping and grumbling about it, making nasty remarks on Twitter to the extent that she dares to. What surprises me is the very small remaining rump of trolls who have time for her. One particularly vile individual is @CraftyMuvva, who is likely to face heavy scrutiny herself in the near future. Their latest ploy is to write unpleasant public posts on Twitter and then claim anyone who reads them is stalking them (evidence archive) by monitoring their communications.

The corrected strike-out and costs Order against Esther Baker.

For new readers, it is worth reminding them who Baker is. At the height of the paedophilia hysteria engendered by Exaro and Carl Beech, Esther Baker alleged that she was raped by a number of men on Cannock Chase as a child. After a police investigation into her ever-changing story, followed by CPS consideration, no charges were brought. Baker sought a review. The CPS responded to D1’s request under the Victim’s Right of Review Scheme. In that document, dated 15 March 2018, the CPS prosecutor says as follows, having reviewed all of the evidence collected in the case relating to all of the alleged rapes that there are “no witnesses”, “no medical or forensic evidence” and “no one else has come forward with a similar complaint”.

In fact, since then we have discovered that police had ample evidence it was not true. One man Baker accused was a prominent Labour Lord. But, he was in his late 60’s or 70’s and had prostate surgery, most likely also having had his testicles removed. Hemming did not have a birthmark Baker claimed her assailant had. Baker’s father was abroad at the time of the supposed rapes.

Esther Baker has been handed a life-long restraining Order by Mrs Justice Steyn. She has had her day in court and the ‘Truth’ has indeed been proven.

The allegation was finally ended late last year when, after obsessive Baker tried to sue John Hemming, Mrs Justice Steyn ruled the allegations, “untrue” and restrained Baker for life from repeating them. That was not the only restraining Order Baker picked up in the latter end of 2019. She was also restrained for life from harassing a child abuse victim. The court found she had engaged in racist harassment of the victim, whose private communications she was alleged to have been monitoring.

This is as chaff in the wind to @CraftyMuvva, a dangerous extremist whose trolling public twitter feed has often backed false allegations from a position of near total ignorance. In 2019, a woman named Sabine McNeill was jailed for 9 years for stalking families in Hampstead with completely false allegations of satanic conspiracy, cannibalism and child abuse. Sentencing, Judge Sally Cahill, QC said as follows – “The children’s lives have been blighted forever. In my judgement you are an arrogant, malicious, evil and manipulative woman”. Far from protecting the children, it was McNeill who had abused them. She was backed by @CraftyMuvva –

Evidence of @CraftyMuvva’s dangerous extremism in backing the hoax spread by proven abuser McNeil.

Aside from helping a monstrous child-abuser by (at best) ignorantly spreading her vile lies, @CraftyMuvva has also used her Twitter account to … support a monstrous paedophile, specifically Carl Beech (formerly known as ‘Nick’). Nick accused half the British cabinet of child abuse and is presently in prison for 18 years for a mixture of possession of child abuse images and perverting the course of justice. This is what @CraftyMuvva said –

Crafty Muvva backed paedophile Carl Beech.

There are many other examples. As with McNeill, some of @CraftyMuvva‘s posts could potentially cause grave harm to vulnerable victims. Clearly, there is a public interest in unmasking this abuser. Despite being a brazen internet troll, @CraftyMuvva has escaped scrutiny for some time now by manipulating police with tales she is an innocent victim. Apparently police have even in the past phoned people who have written legitimate articles about her.

This blog has in the past dealt robustly with false police complaints. In 2015, police had to apologise for giving me a harassment warning (and revoke it) after a complaint from Cambridge transgender Liberal Democrat Sarah Brown. Her friend James Billingham also complained but although Hampshire police initially took him seriously, in the end they told him in writing I am free to sue him and write articles about him and they will not get involved. History repeated itself in 2018 when Ellie Reeves MP tried to have police prevent the publication of my article, “Ellie Reeves and the Corpses of Children”. The Metropolitan Police rapidly changed their tune after receiving a letter of claim for judicial review.

Your author finds that police do not like to be used to protect extremists, internet trolls or callous politicians, and rapidly lose sympathy when the full situation is revealed. Hopefully any officer reading this will reflect on Crafty’s posts above. But, if that is not enough they should also reflect on the court Order above, the fact that I went to law school and on the fact that I absolutely will sue if there are improper attempts to stop me covering Clare and I will recover substantial damages and my costs of doing so. I am absolutely entitled to reveal the real world identities of online abusers and trolls, seek reaction from their acquaintances and employers and draw their conduct to the attention of appropriate safeguarding authorities.

The tide is turning for monsters like Crafty. Many online platforms, for example YouTube, now recognise how dangerous this type of content is and how it can radicalise vulnerable people. Child abuse conspiracy theories are now prohibited on YouTube after an armed man invaded a pizza parlour in Washington having fallen for a conspiracy theory online that US Democrats were holding children in a network of tunnels in the basement. Whilst doubtless there are vast and legitimate concerns about paedophiles on the left, this particular theory was completely false as the man soon found.

Unfortunately for Muvva, like most abusers, she has finally run into someone who she absolutely cannot stop. Her account is named in my lawsuit against Sonia Poulton which was filed in the High Court, via CE-File this weekend, and I am contemplating joining her as a Defendant. It is time this vile troll was unmasked. I actually have put an agency on it. Whilst Crafty may think she is safe behind a screen, she has been leaving clues to her identity for years. It has been alleged she lives in Richmond and I do have a name and an old address in Twickenham. If that is wrong there are plenty of other clues including her love of crocheting and her reckless posting of pictures of children on her trolling account.

If I was an internet troll like @CraftyMuvva, I would keep my children out of it. Eerily though, Crafty has posted pictures of her children, which I believe is gravely irresponsible given her main uses for the account. Obviously, I am not going to name or picture Crafty’s children in this article as on present information it would be contrary to the Editor’s Code, which this blog has regard to. It is however, behaviour worthy of robust challenge and condemnation. It will be drawn to the attention of social services, especially given the apparent risk of exposure to extremist, radical content.

Doubtless this article will upset Crafty. Not, I suspect as much as the ones that are planned, the possible litigation, police and social services investigations she may be facing. The trolls who surround Baker have been thinning in recent years. Those who remain seem to have a bizarre sense of immunity. The only reason that anti-Semite @Ciabaudo (who Crafty associates with), for example, has so far escaped being sued is a mixture of my laziness and his impotence. We have an address for service and he owns a property. @CraftyMuvva also has no immunity. Online abuse has serious consequences, as this despicable woman will be finding out.