Kiwifarms Hacked, @OpSyndicate42 (#OS24) Claims Responsibility

Posted on September 19, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

Vile stalking site Kiwifarms has been hacked again, by unknown third parties, using an unknown mechanism. It is presently down with no more than a user impact statement visible (archive). According to a statement posted on the site by Joshua Conner Moon, (Kiwifarms’ murderous paedophile owner), user emails, passwords and IP addresses have been compromised. A Twitter account claiming to be operated by a hacker collective, @OpSyndicate42, has claimed responsibility and indeed, threatened forthcoming attacks on 31 August 2022.

A Twitter account claiming to be operated by hacker collective OpSyndicate42 threatens to attack Kiwifarms.

In his statement, Moon has confirmed the site was hacked. He is not certain of the mechanism but believes the hack was done using a script file disguised as an audio clip that was uploaded to the forum and then executed. Of course, this was one of many challenges for Kiwifarms anticipated when I had Kiwifarms’ license revoked last year. In 2021, I got in touch with the makers of Xenforum, pointing out that Kiwifarms’ illegal content and activities plainly breached the license terms. The manufacturers agreed and revoked the license, forcing Kiwifarms to illegally use a nulled installation in breach of copyright law. Lack of access to patches and security updates made Kiwifarms vulnerable to rival criminals.

Joshua Conner Moon bemoans Kiwifarms’ having its Xenforum license revoked.

Based on Telegram chats, some Kiwifarms users apparently frightened of exposure. This only underlines the folly of joining a murderous stalking site.

MHN will be following this story. We will not be doing anything illegal, but can look at disclosures from whistleblowers. Email address on the about page, here.

Kiwifarms Banned by DiamWall CDN, Attack CEO Hugo Carvalho and Website

Posted on September 15, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

[Updated 16 September 2022 after DiamWall banned Kiwifarms] Despicable stalking, paedophilia and terrorism site Kiwifarms returned very briefly yesterday on a domain protected by a previously obscure Portuguese DDOS protector called DiamWall. The return was short-lived as DiamWall banned them within hours.

A screenshot when trying to access the Kiwifarms via TOR reveals DiamWall is the supposed DDOS protection and CDN.

MHN asks the DiamWall support department, apparently posing as their own CEO, to address the Kiwifarms question. Click for full size.

Victims contacted CEO Hugo Carvalho about his firm providing services to a website run by a murderous maniacal paedophile, that contains involuntary pornography of young women, and which has repeatedly been removed from hosts such as Gandi.net for illegal child pornography.

I decided to contact DiamWall. I accessed their site and the chat help – and was flabbergasted when the online chat claimed I was connected to no less a figure than the CEO (although the person talking to me later claimed to work in the support department).

I asked the ‘CEO’ if ‘he’? knew Kiwifarms had been dropped by Cloudflare, DDOS-Guard and had taken a policy vote to target pre-teens. They asked me to email legal@diamwall.com. However, Hugo has other social media, such as his Instagram (archive), Twitter (archive) and Facebook (archive). He has an ‘official’ email address at nexus2oficial@hotmail.com. Just a reminder for everyone, Kiwifarms really did take an official policy vote to target children (archive). I encouraged readers to make polite, respectful contact to express their concerns. Not long after, Kiwi Farms had their relationship with DiamWall terminated.

To underline how awful Kiwifarms is, users in a Kiwi Farms Telegram channel then claimed to have hacked and defaced the DiamWall website and also attempted to review bomb the company on Google. One of the Kiwis opponents, @Keffals asked their supporters to leave good reviews. Interestingly, the good reviews are swamping the bad, which demonstrates the degradation of Kiwifarms’ userbase and organisation.

Depraved paedophile Dynastia holds a policy vote on Kiwifarms. They vote to target children.

#UnfollowSoniaPoulton: Reminder that the Fringe Journalist who Attacked the Queen is a Child Abuser

Posted on September 9, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

Sonia Poulton seen making an ‘official statement’ on a lawsuit against her. Extracted still used for the purpose of criticism and review.

Yesterday, in the afternoon, Queen Elizabeth II died. As with any death, there are of course those who loved her, and those who did not. Basic human decency has always dictated that when a person dies their critics and enemies fall silent for a while, save to deliver eulogies. Of course, historic figures are not immune to criticism but, simply put, it can wait for a little while. In any event, there is in truth very little bad to say about the Queen. She has spent 70 years in uncomplaining public service. An exception to the rule is, of course, vile fringe journalist Sonia Poulton, who responded to news of the Queen’s death as below, including the words, “[…] the next few days is going to be a giant vomit-inducing festival of royal reverence with media tarts weeping and wailing about someone they don’t know […]” (archive). This is a public service reminder that Sonia Poulton was recently interviewed by police after naming two child torture victims who had been granted life long anonymity, and the video had to be taken down. Illegal or not, in my opinion that was serious child abuse. The charge has been levelled by others, including (according to a recent video by Natural Love) anonymous hackers. Unlike the hackers, your author is not anonymous. My name and picture are below and I will defend this article in court if need be.

Me me me: Child abuser and fringe ‘journalist’: Sonia Poulton unleashes her venom in response to the death of Queen Elizabeth II, a longstanding public servant.

Sonia Poulton likes to hold herself out as an expert on high profile allegations of child abuse, satanic abuse and VIP abuse. Her work is clearly adjacent to the Q-Anon conspiracy space. The problem is, she is in fact one of the shoddiest, so-called ‘journalists’ I have ever encountered but has chosen one of the most sensitive spaces to work in, which is clearly beyond her abilities and character. One example of her so called, ‘journalism’ is a previous video of a royal parade, made whilst the queen was alive, in which Poulton can be heard shrieking, “Nazi!” and, “She knights paedophiles!”

The case that got Sonia into trouble was a well publicised matter involving two children who were tortured by abusers into making false allegations. The judgement was placed online by the judge Mrs Justice Pauffley to try to dispel the hoax. The case citation (with link to the full judgement), is P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding) [2015] EWFC 26. It opens with a reminder that the children have lifelong anonymity and naming them could be a criminal contempt of court. I am going to be careful in this article to limit what I say strictly to the judgement as follows.

Continue reading →

Blood on Their Hands: Kiwi Farms, Randi Harper and Very Ex-Sheriff David Morgan

Posted on September 5, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

There has been a lot of whining online from Kiwi Farmers and extremists over the last few days that the unceremonious departure of Kiwi Farms from Cloudflare is in some way the doom of free speech, or a victory for extremist transgender activists. I am a fairly right-wing British Conservative and I have been campaigning against Kiwi Farms for more than 6 years, sometimes aided by Conservative MP and Minister Grant Shapps. Kiwi Farms, owned by Joshua Conner Moon (who has changed his legal name to James Gabriel Potter) is not being banned for criticising transgender ideology – readers will find Britain’s new Prime Minister Liz Truss has some strong views on the subject. Kiwi Farms is being banned for all the crimes carried out by its owner and members. It is a site so vile it unites right-wing Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene with the Anti-Defamation League and Antifa. Even Hatreon, the literal wannabe neo-Nazi alternative to Patreon, banned Kiwi Farms. This is an article to remind readers of two truly awful individuals who helped keep the site up – Randi Harper and David Morgan.

A photograph of Joshua Conner Moon (legal name James Gabriel Potter) before he put on weight. Joshua Moon is a sadistic paedophile who admits to viewing cartoon child pornography and hosted fantasies about abducting, wounding and raping children to death. Image used under the UK Parody exception pursuant to s30A Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Kiwi Farms is not being banned because it is a final bastion of free speech. Kiwi Farms is being banned because it is an organised terrorism and gang-stalking site, that has hounded a number of innocent people – gay, straight, trans and normal – to suicide through defamation and criminal harassment. Its owner Joshua Moon is an avowed, maniacal, paedophile who is on record as saying that ordinary child pornography is not arousing enough for him and he needs, “hurtcore”. Who knowingly and willingly hosted fanfic paedophile stories in which, “Big J” – an alias for Josh himself, moved to a third world country, abducted, mutilated, raped and murdered children. If a service supports Kiwi Farms, they are not supporting free speech they are supporting a website whose members, led by sadistic paedophile Dynastia, took a vote to target children. Paedo-Dynastia has always been arrogant and convinced of his or her immunity – but what will they do when Josh is finally interviewed? They will be identified, hunted down and dealt with. The final straw for Kiwi Farms was repeated bomb threats.

The crumbling of Kiwi Farms is not over yet, but when it is gone there will still be free speech for Conservatives, for Gender Critical Feminists, even for the Alt-Right. Liz Truss herself has signalled her intent to use current Parliamentary legislation to protect the right to free speech online (archive). Those laws may protect many people such as Milo Yiannopoulos or Vox Day. There will be nothing for the Kiwi Farmers though. “Paedophiles unite for stalking yay!” is not a proposal that will ever gain popular public support. There will still be a Ralph Retort – Ethan Ralph being yet another right wing commentator who is celebrating the downfall of the Kiwi Farms (archive).

Many people have expressed surprise that the owner of the Kiwi Farms site was not arrested earlier. Perhaps if he had, lives might have been saved – such as the 51 Muslims who were shot dead in the Christchurch Mosque shootings whose perpetrator was abetted by Moon (archive). For that, I blame two people. Step forward, Randi Harper, enabler of the paedophile monster Joshua Conner Moon! In 2016 Joshua Moon was arrested by Pensacola police after his stalking email service lolcow.email was used to threaten murders at local schools. Randi helped pressure the sheriff into releasing him. She was publicly thanked by the Kiwis and the thread on her was locked in gratitude. She wrote an article about the support on Medium, claiming to be motivated by morality (archive). However, she was later accused of using the site to attack her enemies (archive). Nora Reed, a transwoman who accused Harper, described her as, “a fucking snake”.

Continue reading →

Solicitors Regulatory Authority – “Gathering Information” Over Alleged Gerald Shamash Letter to @Women4Wes

Posted on September 2, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

As a Conservative law blogger, I read left-wing Labour blog the Skwawkbox surprisingly often, usually in an attempt to convince Labour-backing family members that Keir Starmer is a bad man and they should consider that, “other” party. Earlier today, I happened to notice a story about a Twitter account called @Women4Wes and a letter the operator had allegedly received from solicitor Gerald Shamash from Edwards Duthie Shamash. The letter was so plainly deficient that I reported it to the SRA, since if he really wrote it, I felt it should be investigated as a conduct issue. The SRA have now confirmed they are gathering further information. At the same time, Edwards Duthie Shamash (EDS) have contacted me saying that the letter is a forgery, which I find to be a plausible explanation. Either way, someone is in trouble.

A letter allegedly from Gerald Shamash, solicitor, to a Twitter user. The letter opens by purporting to be an order. Mr Shamash’s law firm, EDS, say it is forged and he did not write it.

This is a really bad solicitors letter. So bad, I was not certain that a real solicitor wrote it. The letter does not clearly identify a head of claim, although it refers to harassment and content which, “infringes” on their client’s character. It does not refer to a statute or to my mind comply with adequate clarity with the Practice Direction on Pre-action Conduct or any pre-action protocol. For example, I am not clear how a site called, @Women4Wes can be said to be pretending to be Wes Streeting. If I was writing this letter for myself or someone I was charitably assisting as a McKenzie Friend, I would comply fully with the Pre-action Protocol for Media and Communications claims. There would probably be a schedule of harassing tweets and also defamatory tweets.

However, the real flaw is in the opening five words, “This CEASE AND DESIST ORDER […]“. I’m a gonna lay it out there. This letter is not a court order. Solicitors generally do not and cannot make, “cease and desist” orders. Judges do. Anyone with a reasonable familiarity with the legal system should know this and critically, a solicitor ought to know this is not appropriate. A legally ignorant, poorly educated, recipient might well confuse this with a court order such as a restraining order. It is on headed notepaper, apparently from a real firm of solicitors. It looks, “official”.

That is not to endorse the @Women4Wes account, which has to my mind made some very unwise posts. I did see, within moments of reading it, what I thought was an actionable post (albeit, not actionable by Mr Streeting). That is no excuse for this letter. If I was an aggrieved politician and I paid a solicitor to write a letter and they sent me this as a draft I would terminate the instruction on the spot citing a loss of confidence in their competence and then I would demand a full refund of the retainer.

I put the allegation to Gerald Shamash of Edwards Duthie Shamash and to his senior partner, Shaun Murphy, asking if they really wrote this letter. I received a letter from an associate denying it. I also put the allegation to the SRA press office. Taking my points, they confirm that they are looking into the matter. An SRA spokesperson said: “Now we aware of this, we will gather all relevant information before deciding on any next steps.”

Cloudflare and Kiwifarms: An Ominous Cloudflare Executive?

Posted on August 31, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

Kiwi Farms is run by paedophile sadist Joshua Conner Moon and exists to harass the disabled. Click for full size.

#DropKiwiFarms has been trending on Twitter for some time now. The movement seeks to shut down Kiwi Farms – an evil website that this site has been campaigning against since 2016. Members of the campaign have been pushing for support services and providers to terminate the site – in particular Cloudflare. Cloudflare has today released a response (archive) that many have interpreted as a veiled refusal – essentially saying that it is dangerous and not their job to ban websites. In this article I muse on and recap on some of the Kiwis worst hits and recount a disturbing rumour about Cloudflare that some readers might want to look into. It is alleged that a particular Cloudflare user is a Cloudflare executive.

Kiwifarms markets itself as for, “gossip and exploitation of the mentally handicapped for amusement purposes”. Users of the site would defame and manipulate persons with serious disabilities living in the community – female members would even meet them and record ‘dates’ for cruel entertainment. The most well-known victim of the site was Christian Weston Chandler (CWC or Chris-chan), a vulnerable autistic man, now known as Christine whose life became a goldfish bowl – almost a real-life Truman-show. CWC is currently on trial for alleged incest with his mother. He is innocent until proven guilty, but there is substantial evidence that Kiwi Farms users sought to persuade him to commit the act. If he is guilty, it is beyond doubt that the Kiwis bear moral responsibility and likely legal responsibility.

The campaign by Keffals has been supported by some and criticised by others. It is a source of interest to me because I have seen both sides of this argument. Suing and campaigning to silence false and defamatory speech, whilst also wanting to protect controversial speech including, for example, Milo Yiannopoulos. I do not agree with a lot of what Milo says but he did not deserve to be banned from Twitter. I have been reflecting on the moral line. What is the difference? It is this –

What would happen to me if I started a website called SamsDrugsRUs.com and sold cocaine online? I would be arrested. Any service provider that found out would ban me. I would have my door kicked in by police and spend decades in prison. There is a reason drugs markets are on the darknet. There is no country in the world where that is legal. There is no country that will enforce a contract that one party is using for illegal purposes. You can evict a tenant who is running an illegal brothel or a crack-den. You can drop a website that is engaging in copyright violations.

The line with Kiwi Farms is the blatant illegality on the site itself and the spin-offs. Marjorie Taylor Greene is not the first politician targeted in connection with the site. Kiwi Farms owner Joshua Conner Moon set up a site called 9chan where users made a forum called /leftnudes/ for stalking left-wing politicians and boasted about trying to break in to British Member of Parliament Jess Phillips’ house.

Members of sinister Kiwi Farms sister-site 9chan (also owned by Joshua Conner Moon) claim that they tried to break in to Jess Phillips’ house.

Continue reading →

Could the UK High Court Case of Smith v Baker Determine the Delaware Case of Twitter v Musk et al and the Fate of Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde?

Posted on August 23, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

Vijaya Gadde at a Fortune Brainstorm Tech event. Would she be such a popular speaker if she was properly no-platformed due to her allowing vile stalking and racism against a child rape victim as well as anti-Semitism? Picture by Photograph by Kevin Moloney/Fortune Brainstorm TECH. (NC License here).

On 4 April 2020, I published the article, “Twitter’s Del Harvey / Alison Shea and Vijaya Gadde Openly Back Child Rape Stalker and Anti-Semite Racist”. Multiple parties, including Twitter, threatened lawsuits. Twitter did not make good on their threats. Esther Baker attempted to do so. The lawsuit over the article, brought by Esther Baker in the High Court in London, was commenced in 2020 (before the Twitter purchase was proposed) and determined in my favour last week. The lawsuit has the potential to harm Twitter’s reputation. So, did Twitter know about it, and did they disclose it to Elon Musk when they formed the purchase agreement between Twitter and Musk currently being litigated in Delaware in the United States? Did Twitter notify Musk of the legal risks arising from the matters in this article – “Labour’s Secret Deal with Twitter and Facebook to Surveil its own members”? The article ended with an express threat to draw it to the attention of the relevant regulatory law enforcement body.

It is worth recapping for new readers. In 2020 I was covering a significant amount of what, in my opinion, was wrongdoing by Twitter. The Labour Party head office team had been using an in-house application that used their database of member emails, cross-referenced with privileged access to the Twitter API, to scan their members’ tweets for statements warranting disciplinary action. It is unclear if members’ consent was ever clearly sought for this by either the Labour Party or Twitter, or whether they were told about it. It is likely that would have been a legal requirement for processing to be compliant with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The second issue was Twitter’s inconsistent handling of complaints of breaches of its rules. Esther Baker, had, at the time, been made subject to two restraining orders by UK courts. One was for libel and the other was for, in the words of His Honour Judge Gargan, “particularly malevolent” and “racist” stalking. One of her supporters, Alan Goodwin, had made plainly anti-Semitic posts including gratuitous, utterly baseless, speculation that a senior British government minister had conspired with Mossad to cover up child abuse. The actions of Esther Baker (@Esther9982) and her supporter Alan Goodwin (@Ciabaudo), followed by Twitter lawyer Vijaya Gadde’s failure to deal with them even after being thoroughly put on notice, were the subjects of my 4 April article.

Around 8pm on 1 May 2020, I received a letter from UK lawyers Bristows telling me that my article was libellous and there was, “no conceivable chance of defending” it as truth or honest opinion and saying it should be, “removed immediately”. I refused, and published the relevant section of the letter and mocked them in this article. I then requested further information under UK pre-action rules. Much as Elon Musk complains, Twitter were curiously reluctant to answer my questions and backed off as I detailed in my later article, “Twitter and Bristows in Humiliating Libel Climb Down”.

Extract from Bristows' Email of 6 May 2020

Bristows now claim they were never threatening to sue me on behalf of Twitter. That letter they sent me late on a Friday night was just abstract information shootin’ the breeze.

Bristows are a proper libel law firm and therefore know better than to test me in court. I stand by the article. Vijaya and her colleagues have in effect supported the actions of Esther Baker and Alan Goodwin by not banning / permanently suspending them from Twitter, when others have been banned without recourse for far lesser wrongdoing. In fact Twitter did not even remove the tweets that were the actus re of the stalking, just made them inaccessible in the UK.

Continue reading →

Sonia Poulton, Fake News, and Holding Herself Out as a Journalist

Posted on July 14, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

On Wednesday 13 July 2022, there was a hearing in Hemming v Poulton. I was excused attendance, because although I am a party to the case the technical application between John and Poulton is nothing to do with me and also I had a medical appointment. So, I was astonished to read a highly misleading tweet (archive) by Poulton claiming the court had ‘accepted’ her objections to being described as, “someone who holds herself out as a journalist”. This is fake news.

Sonia Poulton’s tweet is misleading. The court has in no way accepted her objections to the phrase referred to, now made any decision on it.

What happened at the hearing is that it was originally listed before a Master but when further issues were raised late by the parties, the Master decided it needed to be dealt with by a judge and adjourned the hearing. Nothing was decided, least of all was there any decision that the phrase could not be used or was wrong, or that Sonia is a reputable journalist. Nor is it likely to be determined when the hearing was resumed as it is not in issue on the applications.

What was before the court was that John Hemming has applied to expand his claim against Sonia Poulton. Poulton objects. That is the application listed to be decided. The night before the hearing, Poulton via her barrister Richard Munden raised an issue of limitation that some of the proposed amendments relate to claims that are out of time. John via his barrister says they are not out of time but on the safe side applied for an extension of time on the morning of the hearing. With the new and technically complex material, the Master decided a judge should hear the applications.

Sonia did (by her barrister Richard Munden), object to the phrase but the court in no way, for example, told Hemming or his barrister Matthew Hodson not to use it nor struck the form of words out of Hemming’s documents. Hodson has not descended into the arena on this issue, but Hemming commented saying that the Master did not address the point at all. It is bizarre because Hemming is not even disputing Poulton is a, ‘journalist’ because it is not a regulated profession or reserved title. Anyone can stumble in off the street and say they are a ‘journalist’ in the UK. John’s pleadings at paragraph 2 say that the, “Defendant is a freelance journalist”. However, I am entitled to the opinion that Poulton is not a good or ethical journalist. There are a number of reasons and my opinion is based upon all of the facts set out in these linked articles of mine – [1] [2][3][4][5] and the matters raised in this one.

Poulton has been raising money on the cases she is involved in and statements like this to her supporters are highly misleading. It is not the first time. At a hearing last year, Poulton claimed that she had received 85% of her costs, “of the hearing” (archive). This was false. Poulton had received 85% of her costs of only one of several applications. The others had been decided differently – one she had no costs of. One she has to pay Hemming, but delayed until the end of the case. She also agreed to pay my costs and Darren Laverty’s. So her overall recovery was lower and she had to pay me. The overall effect of this order is that everyone except me lost money. Extracts from the order are below –

Extracts from the order sealed 14 July illustrate the misleading nature of Poulton’s statements. She got 85% of her costs on one application, lost all her costs of another, has to pay John later and paid Darren and I.

Continue reading →

Joy and Dismay for Conservatives in Welwyn-Hatfield After Labour Leader Loses Council Seat

Posted on May 6, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

Conservatives in Welwyn-Hatfield had a good election night on Thursday 5 May, losing only 2 of 28 council seats on the borough council despite being behind in the polls nationally, with a public angry about breaches of Covid laws by members of the Conservative Government. The Conservatives were also devastated as one of their best assets, longstanding local Labour leader Kieran Thorpe, lost his council election. Although Labour gained 2 seats, they also lost 1 to the Liberal Democrats, meaning a net gain of a mere 1 seat for the group.

Former Labour Councillor Kieran Thorpe and Former Labour Leader. Not the sharpest tool in Keir Starmer’s box.

When I was a school leaver, just entering university, Welwyn Hatfield Council was controlled by the Labour Party. Two large political groups fought each other for control of the local authority. British local government elections have always tended to go against the national government – the public wisely keen to distribute power between parties. After nearly 18 years of Conservative rule they had handed much of local government across the UK to Labour.

Yet now, 25 years later, despite the Conservatives having had nearly 12 years in government, the Labour group on the council only holds 10 seats, slightly outmatched by the Liberal Democrats on 12. Nationally, Labour has only a single Parliamentary seat in Scotland and has failed to make headway in regaining the so-called, “red wall” constituencies.

Why have the Conservatives had such good results locally? Why is Labour failing to make headway in the Borough or nationally?

Continue reading →

Just v Moody: Doctor Louise Moody Settles, but She is Right About Harrop

Posted on January 3, 2022 by Samuel Collingwood Smith

Last week I was interested to read an article by Doctor Louise Moody, which linked to uploads of legal letters she had sent claiming I had broken the law by serving ‘court documents’ on her. Not least, because forwarding an email with unsigned draft documents is not service (Bar Standards Board v O’Connor (a Barrister) [2012] 17th August, Visitors to the Inns of Court at 33) and if it is, recent case law states that McKenzie Friends are permitted to effect service for their clients, because solicitors use unqualified process servers all the time (Ndole Assets Ltd v Designer M&E Services UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2865, 67). She has now removed these allegations and settled with Simon.

The allegations were very serious, and amounted to an allegation I have committed a criminal offence, which Mr Just abetted and procured. After these cases were pointed out to her, she has now settled and removed the allegations, including agreeing with Mr Just never to repeat them, nor to mention him at all save to rebut allegations by third parties.

I add that I hope this matter is at an end because leaving aside this strange incident, I agree in large part with Moody on the issues of transgender identity. I feel that Doctor Harrop, the GP whose conduct was at issue in the online debate that apparently prompted all this, should have been struck off not just suspended. His conduct was far worse than Barbara Hewson’s. I take the view that drunkenly publicly swearing at your regulator as Hewson did is a slapped wrist / warning / week suspension offence.

However, in the Harrop case the GMC found,

“The tribunal considered that Dr Harrop’s actions in posting inappropriate tweets over a sustained period of time, in contradiction to the advice he was given, breached fundamental tenets of the profession.

His actions brought the profession into disrepute, undermining public confidence in the profession and the standards of conduct expected from members of the profession.”

It is amazing how many SJW ‘transgender allies’ and ‘male feminists’ turn out to engage in inappropriate or creepy behaviours. They seem to feel their beliefs justify anything up to and including stalking (that is not to say Harrop’s behaviour amounted to stalking, albeit it was found to be improper).

I would like to add again that I do not condone the @ReporterLAL account. I do agree with some of the observations and some of the, ‘victims’ clearly provoked matters but even so some of the @ReporterLAL account’s tweets I do not agree with and I distance myself from it, as does Mr Just. I expressly do not condone the comments about Dr Moody’s deceased partner.

Matthew Hopkins – The Witchfinder General

Exposing the Guilty – Protecting the Vulnerable

Category Archives: Twitter

Kiwifarms Hacked, @OpSyndicate42 (#OS24) Claims Responsibility

Kiwifarms Banned by DiamWall CDN, Attack CEO Hugo Carvalho and Website

#UnfollowSoniaPoulton: Reminder that the Fringe Journalist who Attacked the Queen is a Child Abuser

Blood on Their Hands: Kiwi Farms, Randi Harper and Very Ex-Sheriff David Morgan

Solicitors Regulatory Authority – “Gathering Information” Over Alleged Gerald Shamash Letter to @Women4Wes

Cloudflare and Kiwifarms: An Ominous Cloudflare Executive?

Could the UK High Court Case of Smith v Baker Determine the Delaware Case of Twitter v Musk et al and the Fate of Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde?

Sonia Poulton, Fake News, and Holding Herself Out as a Journalist

Joy and Dismay for Conservatives in Welwyn-Hatfield After Labour Leader Loses Council Seat

Just v Moody: Doctor Louise Moody Settles, but She is Right About Harrop