2000 Trees and James Scarlett to be Sued, Bankrupted?

Will this post ruin James Scarlet's Career?

This post by the 2000 Trees Festival could ruin James Scarlet’s career forever, and leave him personally bankrupt.

I have just been asked to look at a case of what may be appalling abuse and misconduct by a music festival operator, James Scarlett. James is the organiser of the 2000 Trees music festival, which is operated by the Real Festival Company Limited. It appears that online allegations were made about abuse by a band member. The band member denies the allegations, and as far as I can determine so far has never been convicted or even invited for questioning by police. The festival, having seen the allegations, dropped him with a statement that appears to contain the false imputation that there was a meaningful investigation with an adverse outcome finding the allegations upheld. The festival then invited further comment from random members of the public. In effect, inviting gossip and speculation on the official 2000 Trees Facebook, whilst apparently deleting exculpatory posts. MHN is considering extending pro-bono support to the band. If the firm running the festival, the Real Festival Company Limited, is bankrupted that could affect its ability to pay acts – and the reputations of those associated with the firm or James. Other acts may need to consider whether they will stay on the line-up for the at-risk festival.

For those of you who do not know me, perhaps coming from 2000 Trees fansite or wherever, I am a law blogger. I have passed a Master’s Degree in Law (Legal Practice) with the solicitor’s exams (LL.M LPC) but not sought to practice as a solicitor. I do help people in court as a McKenzie Friend at the highest level – only ever for charity. For example, I was praised in Parliament helped a vulnerable woman accused of lacking mental capacity obtain a court declaration she had capacity and therefore retain her autonomy and her children (link to Parliament).

Continue reading

Share Button

Natalie Tyree of #FiberHub Terminated by Century 21 Real Estate Over Services to Kiwifarms – Is Worse to Follow?

Natalie Tyree Personally Fired

Natalie Tyree has, ironically, objected to the use of her professional picture on this website, which may necessitate the use of a paparazzi or volunteers to get a different photograph. In the meantime here is an email from her boss confirming he personally fired her. Click for full size.

Natalie Tyree, Chief Financial Officer of FiberHub and wife of FiberHub Chief Executive Officer Rob Tyree, has been terminated from a lucrative second job as a Century 21 realtor (estate agent, as we say here in Britain) after intervention by MHN. Your author reached out over FiberHub’s ongoing provision of support to Kiwifarms. Given the historic outcomes for Kiwifarms supporters, it is likely things will only get worse for the Tyrees and their family. After covering recent events, this article goes on to provide a list of all identified FiberHub customer domains to assist in organising a boycott campaign.

[Update 17 October 2022 – Natalie Tyree has filed a DMCA request over her photograph. This is unlikely to help her in the long run, and is just a temporary solution. If MHN cannot find a suitably licensed photograph, your author can just hire a photographer / paparazzi (anti-Kiwi volunteers welcome)]

Despicable paedophile, terrorist, organised stalking site Kiwi Farms is the internet’s pariah. The site and family of services operated by Joshua Conner Moon (who has legally changed his name to James Gabriel Potter) is so vile it was not only banned by VISA and MasterCard, it was refused service by Hatreon, the now defunct neo-Nazi hate-speech funding platform. That decision was made after Hatreon supremo Cody Wilson read a child-murder-rape-fanfic story willingly and knowingly hosted by Kiwi Farms owner Joshua Conner Moon and banned him in horror and revulsion. Even 8chan / 8kun, the Daily Stormer and VanwaTech want nothing to do with the revoltingly degenerate, toxic site. Unsurprisingly, neither does far more respectable firm Century 21. Responding to an inquiry by MHN, a spokesperson said as follows –

“Thank you for reaching out and alerting us of the pending article. As you may know, Century 21 Real Estate is a franchisor and thus affiliated brokerages are each independently owned and operated. Our team has brought this situation to the attention of the local broker who has confirmed that the agent’s affiliation with the company was immediately terminated. Beyond that, we are not able to comment further on any legal matter relating to an affiliated brokerage.”

It likely however, that far worse is to come for the Tyrees. FiberHub and the Tyree family have many other vulnerabilities that can be targeted by the legitimately aggrieved, some of which are set out below. Continue reading

Share Button

Caroline Farrow Claims Arrest Over Alleged Kiwifarms Posts

Prominent, controversial, feminist activist Caroline Farrow has announced on Twitter (archive) that she has been arrested, her electronic devices seized and she has been questioned over posts on Kiwifarms. She denies guilt and so far has not been charged. This follows on from my article a couple of weeks ago in which MHN drew an inference that the British National Crime Agency was behind the hack of Kiwifarms and multiple suspects would be interviewed from a list based on the database. Given police have not denied it and multiple people are complaining on Twitter about being arrested and / or questioned, I am pretty confident in the story. Now might be a good time for MHN to remind readers about the UK British concept of joint enterprise. 

Caroline Farrow credibly claims to have been arrested over alleged Kiwifarms posts.

Caroline Farrow credibly claims to have been arrested over alleged Kiwifarms posts. Whilst denying posting is a defence, responding to police questions about malicious online communicationa with, “women don’t have a penis” may not be the wisest response.

Your author is not going to belabour the, “MHN told you so”, point. Instead, it is worth directing readers to British law on joint enterprise. Joint enterprise is a UK law where people engaging in a common enterprise are liable in criminal law for all actions of the entire group. The doctrine originated from the English case of R v Swindall and Osborne (1846) in which two cart drivers had a race. A bystander was killed and both blamed the other. The court held it did not matter who killed the bystander, they were both criminally liable for deciding on the joint enterprise of a cart race.

In the case of Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 a young gang member named Armel Gnango became involved in a shootout. His opponent accidentally shot and killed a woman called, Magda Pniewska. Gnango was convicted of the murder even though he did not fire the shot. When the appeals over this reached the UK Supreme Court, the court asked the following question –

“1. Permission to appeal was granted in this case in order to enable this Court to consider the following point of law, certified by the Court of Appeal as being of general public importance: “If (1) D1 and D2 voluntarily engage in fighting each other, each intending to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to the other and each foreseeing that the other has the reciprocal intention, and if (2) D1 mistakenly kills V in the course of the fight, in what circumstances, if any, is D2 guilty of the offence of murdering V?”

The court had an answer:

“65. For these reasons we would answer the certified question in the affirmative, allow this appeal and restore the respondent’s conviction for murder.”

In Britain, you can commit murder by being shot at by someone intending to kill you. Some people argue that the law is harsh and a number of NGOs and charities have sought reform. For example, Justice Gap Magazine said this in an article, “Half of women convicted under joint enterprise not even present a scene” (archive).

It is important to remember that Caroline Farrow has not been convicted and denies the posts she is accused of. She is innocent until proven guilty and has not yet been convicted with any crime.

Even so, the reason this should terrify any contributor to Kiwifarms is that, well, Continue reading

Share Button

Police Respond on Kiwi Farms Hack Data, Citing Privacy Laws (that is, basically ‘yes’?)

West Yorkshire Police refuse to comment on named individuals. Click for full size.

West Yorkshire Police refuse to comment on named individuals. Click for full size.

Two days ago I posted an article about suspicions that Kiwi Farms, the despicable paedophilia, terrorism and hate site run by Joshua Conner Moon, has been hacked by law enforcement. Moon (who has legally changed his name to James Gabriel Potter), was forced to take the site down and notify users of the hack. Subsequently, at least one user complained of being invited to interview by British police. So, I asked the police force concerned. I expected if it is a hoax they would say so. On the other hand, if there is an investigation and they do have the data they would give a vague answer citing privacy and data protection laws. So, MHN received a response and it is door number 2.

The police response bears some parsing. I sent them a letter found on Twitter, with the West Yorkshire Police force logo purportedly inviting a Kiwifarms poster to a formal interview, but which had the suspect’s name blanked out. I asked the following questions –

“(1) Is there any form of investigation into posts on Kiwifarms ongoing, by or in conjunction with, West Yorkshire Police?

(2) What would police say in general to persons proposing to join and / or post on illegal websites?

(3) Is the letter genuine (copy attached)?

(4) Have UK law enforcement come into possession of the user and IP data from the recent hack of Kiwifarms?

(5) Did the National Crime Agency hack Kiwifarms?”

A Kiwifarmer purportedly invited to da cop shop! The police response means it is likely real. Click for full size.

A Kiwifarmer purportedly invited to da cop shop! The police response means it is likely real. Click for full size.

I received in response, “We are unable to comment on named individuals”. However, fairly obviously no individual is named in the letter I sent them. Also, none of my questions refer to a named individual. If the letter was forged, data protection and privacy laws would not be engaged. The police would have no reason not to just say it was a forgery. However, these officers in West Yorkshire are not acting like a police force that has been forged, nor a police force that is triumphantly announcing a win. This comes across as a force that is working with partner agencies on a list of offenders and is likely to be concerned about undermining an ongoing, wider investigation. It is similar to how police act when they have obtained the members list from a drugs market darknet site, for example.

What does it mean for Kiwifarmers? Well, it basically means they are in trouble. Joshua Conner Moon / James Gabriel Potter advises users to user TOR or a no-log VPN when accessing his site (whilst simultaneously insisting it is totally legal). The problem is, that is not enough when dealing with the FBI or worse, the British equivalent being the Continue reading

Share Button

Did the UK National Crime Agency (NCA) Hack Kiwi Farms? (Thumbs up if they did)

A Kiwifarmer purportedly invited to da cop shop!

A Kiwifarmer purportedly invited to da cop shop! Click for full size.

Not so long ago I saw a very odd post on Twitter about the currently down, terrorism, paedophilia and stalking site Kiwifarms. An image had been shared in a Kiwi Farms Telegram chatroom, and then re-posted to Twitter where I saw it. It was a purportedly a letter from West Yorkshire Police to a suspect inviting them to a PACE interview (a police interview under caution) about posts on Kiwi Farms. The letter appeared real. The difficulty is, how could a police force obtain the IP address of a poster? After some thought, I realised that all but one of the mechanisms I could think of involved hacking or at least joining Kiwi Farms. Under recent laws, British police can hack websites – which got me thinking about the timing of the recent hack in which the site’s data was deleted.

If the letter inset is real, police must not only know that the user visited Kiwifarms, but have specific evidence that they posted there. After considering the ways to do it, I thought of three mechanisms police could obtain this. Each of these has variations. Firstly, they could intercept traffic from a suspect’s address with a warrant. However, the site is protected by SSL so a simple network interception could only show that the user viewed Kiwifarms, not which part of the site and not what (if anything) they posted. It could not tell if they were logged on nor to which user.

To intercept the content of SSL traffic without detection would require a man-in-the-middle attack performed with a certificate generated with a root key trusted by Windows / Linux / MacOS / Android. It is well known that products exist for the security services for precisely that purpose (archive), so this is possible. With the right key, the security services could just run off their own trusted certificates on the fly. However, that would imply an ongoing warrant.

An alternative way to do it would be to sign up on Kiwifarms then DM a user suspected to be a British person a link which trapped their IP address. This might require authorisation under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA).

Finally, it occurred to me that the police could simply hack Kiwifarms. Under UK law, this could be legal. Last year, the UK passed the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021. This amended RIPA to literally let the police and security services commit crimes, with no limitations on the type of crime whatsoever, including murder, torture and rape. Hacking is small beer – theoretically the police could blow up the data centre. However, the crimes must be authorised under s29B and must be proportionate. The Human Rights Act 1998 also still applies. Therefore, it is doubtful a murder could be authorised unless, for example, many other lives would be saved.

Hacking Kiwifarms, intercepting all their traffic, stealing all the users’ IP addresses and installing Remote Administration Tools (RATs) on their devices as well as Network Investigation Tools (NITs) then deleting all the content would be a far easier sell. Kiwifarms has organised terrorist activity with near impunity for years. Multiple hosts have banned it for hosting child pornography. Its owner is in a foreign state and the main country involved, the United States, is not helpful. Kiwifarms generates lots of crimes in the jurisdiction, including harassment and terrorism. The criminality was escalating at the time the hack began.

If I was a judge, or senior police officer, I simply cannot see much in the way of objection to granting a Criminal Conduct Authorisation to take it down. It is a stalking and terrorism site, clearly organised crime, it has negligible legitimate purposes. Hacking it and deleting all the data, combined with psyops, would create negligible collateral damage to non-perpetrators. I would see an authorisation for hacking as superior to an authorisation for a DDOS attack for that reason.

Which raises questions about the nature of the Twitter account claiming responsibility, @OpSyndicate42, as well as its mockery of the FBI – good natured ribbing from their rivals and partners from across the pond? If the NCA was sharing Kiwifarms user IP addresses with local UK police forces, it would explain their comments about the site users, “dropping like flies”. MHN has put in an inquiry to West Yorkshire Police about the issue to try to verify if the letter is genuine. This article will be updated if a reply is received.

Share Button

#UnfollowSoniaPoulton: Reminder that the Fringe Journalist who Attacked the Queen is a Child Abuser

Sonia Poulton Video Statement

Sonia Poulton seen making an ‘official statement’ on a lawsuit against her. Extracted still used for the purpose of criticism and review.

Yesterday, in the afternoon, Queen Elizabeth II died. As with any death, there are of course those who loved her, and those who did not. Basic human decency has always dictated that when a person dies their critics and enemies fall silent for a while, save to deliver eulogies. Of course, historic figures are not immune to criticism but, simply put, it can wait for a little while. In any event, there is in truth very little bad to say about the Queen. She has spent 70 years in uncomplaining public service. An exception to the rule is, of course, vile fringe journalist Sonia Poulton, who responded to news of the Queen’s death as below, including the words, “[…] the next few days is going to be a giant vomit-inducing festival of royal reverence with media tarts weeping and wailing about someone they don’t know […]” (archive). This is a public service reminder that Sonia Poulton was recently interviewed by police after naming two child torture victims who had been granted life long anonymity, and the video had to be taken down. Illegal or not, in my opinion that was serious child abuse. The charge has been levelled by others, including (according to a recent video by Natural Love) anonymous hackers. Unlike the hackers, your author is not anonymous. My name and picture are below and I will defend this article in court if need be.

Me me me: Child abuser and fringe 'journalist': Sonia Poulton unleashes her venom in response to the death of Queen Elizabeth II, a longstanding public servant.

Me me me: Child abuser and fringe ‘journalist’: Sonia Poulton unleashes her venom in response to the death of Queen Elizabeth II, a longstanding public servant.

Sonia Poulton likes to hold herself out as an expert on high profile allegations of child abuse, satanic abuse and VIP abuse. Her work is clearly adjacent to the Q-Anon conspiracy space. The problem is, she is in fact one of the shoddiest, so-called ‘journalists’ I have ever encountered but has chosen one of the most sensitive spaces to work in, which is clearly beyond her abilities and character. One example of her so called, ‘journalism’ is a previous video of a royal parade, made whilst the queen was alive, in which Poulton can be heard shrieking, “Nazi!” and, “She knights paedophiles!”

The case that got Sonia into trouble was a well publicised matter involving two children who were tortured by abusers into making false allegations. The judgement was placed online by the judge Mrs Justice Pauffley to try to dispel the hoax. The case citation (with link to the full judgement), is P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding) [2015] EWFC 26. It opens with a reminder that the children have lifelong anonymity and naming them could be a criminal contempt of court. I am going to be careful in this article to limit what I say strictly to the judgement as follows.

Continue reading

Share Button

A Statement on Kiwi Farms for GamerGate and KiA

I saw a statement on KiA2 earlier, from Null, which was gaining sympathy from a very small number of misguided people, about the deplatforming of Kiwi Farms. It deserves a response. Kiwi Farms is paedophile, criminal, stalking, terrorist trash. It has nothing to do with free speech.

In 2015, whilst passing through law school, doing my GDL and later my LL.M LPC, I received a police warning for alleged, “harassment” of the Block Bot team (made up of transgender activists) in support of Gamergate. It was frightening to me, and if it had not been revoked, could have been damaging or stopped me finishing my studies. But it was revoked. Using my burgeoning litigation skills I extracted a formal rescindment and apology from Cambridge police. The police apology letter is still up in my article and I reproduce it below. In our society, boycott campaigns are legal. It is legal to write to someone’s employer to draw their attention to egregious wrongdoing even outside their job, or organise a boycott of said company. Free speech is a wide and important protection. If anything, KiA in recent years is too timid about boycott and advertisement cancelling campaigns. Free speech does not however, extend to Kiwi Farms and its satellites, which are forums for exchanging child pornography, defamation and cyberstalking individuals, including children, to death.

PINWithdrawal1

The Police official rescinding the ‘harassment’ notice that had been given on the basis of allegations by Sarah Brown of the Block Bot team.

Ironically, Sarah Brown, like Keffals, is transgender. Like many, I have had to fight for my right to free speech against aggressive transgender activists. I understand how upsetting this ideology can be. Kiwi Farms and their supporters are desperate to convince the unwary that their being deplatformed is something to do with that, that it means no one can criticise transgender persons. That is a ridiculous lie. The new British Prime Minister Liz Truss, has expressed strong views and also on forcing social media companies not to deplatform Conservatives. Laws are being passed this year. Those are views she holds not just in public, but in private. As a Conservative member and blogger, I have met both candidates for leadership of the Conservative Party. Liz Truss spent a good chunk of a Christmas Party I went to last year telling us her very strongly held views on free speech and transgenderism, as well as the need to protect spaces for biological females, and the need to protect children.

That will not help Kiwi Farms. Kiwi Farms is a stalking and terrorism forum run by an avowed paedophile that does and permits things that are illegal even in 1st Amendment jurisdictions, let alone Europe or anywhere else. At no point in history has a proposition along the lines of, “Paedophiles unite for stalking! Yay!”, been legally or socially acceptable. Below, I post an exchange between Joshua Moon and Gandi.net, one of many hosting companies in many companies that deplatformed his site for hosting illegal child pornography, until he had to start his own hosting company, 1776 Hosting. Which has now had its IP addresses rescinded by the Australian government for illegal content.

KiwiFarmsIllegalMaterial

Joshua Moon claims that he did not know there was any child pornography and begs Gandi.net for just one more chance. And fails. Click for full size.

Continue reading

Share Button

Blood on Their Hands: Kiwi Farms, Randi Harper and Very Ex-Sheriff David Morgan

There has been a lot of whining online from Kiwi Farmers and extremists over the last few days that the unceremonious departure of Kiwi Farms from Cloudflare is in some way the doom of free speech, or a victory for extremist transgender activists. I am a fairly right-wing British Conservative and I have been campaigning against Kiwi Farms for more than 6 years, sometimes aided by Conservative MP and Minister Grant Shapps. Kiwi Farms, owned by Joshua Conner Moon (who has changed his legal name to James Gabriel Potter) is not being banned for criticising transgender ideology – readers will find Britain’s new Prime Minister Liz Truss has some strong views on the subject. Kiwi Farms is being banned for all the crimes carried out by its owner and members. It is a site so vile it unites right-wing Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene with the Anti-Defamation League and Antifa. Even Hatreon, the literal wannabe neo-Nazi alternative to Patreon, banned Kiwi Farms. This is an article to remind readers of two truly awful individuals who helped keep the site up – Randi Harper and David Morgan.

JoshuaConnerMoon

A photograph of Joshua Conner Moon (legal name James Gabriel Potter) before he put on weight. Joshua Moon is a sadistic paedophile who admits to viewing cartoon child pornography and hosted fantasies about abducting, wounding and raping children to death. Image used under the UK Parody exception pursuant to s30A Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Kiwi Farms is not being banned because it is a final bastion of free speech. Kiwi Farms is being banned because it is an organised terrorism and gang-stalking site, that has hounded a number of innocent people – gay, straight, trans and normal – to suicide through defamation and criminal harassment. Its owner Joshua Moon is an avowed, maniacal, paedophile who is on record as saying that ordinary child pornography is not arousing enough for him and he needs, “hurtcore”. Who knowingly and willingly hosted fanfic paedophile stories in which, “Big J” – an alias for Josh himself, moved to a third world country, abducted, mutilated, raped and murdered children. If a service supports Kiwi Farms, they are not supporting free speech they are supporting a website whose members, led by sadistic paedophile Dynastia, took a vote to target children. Paedo-Dynastia has always been arrogant and convinced of his or her immunity – but what will they do when Josh is finally interviewed? They will be identified, hunted down and dealt with. The final straw for Kiwi Farms was repeated bomb threats.

The crumbling of Kiwi Farms is not over yet, but when it is gone there will still be free speech for Conservatives, for Gender Critical Feminists, even for the Alt-Right. Liz Truss herself has signalled her intent to use current Parliamentary legislation to protect the right to free speech online (archive). Those laws may protect many people such as Milo Yiannopoulos or Vox Day. There will be nothing for the Kiwi Farmers though. “Paedophiles unite for stalking yay!” is not a proposal that will ever gain popular public support. There will still be a Ralph Retort –  Ethan Ralph being yet another right wing commentator who is celebrating the downfall of the Kiwi Farms (archive).

Many people have expressed surprise that the owner of the Kiwi Farms site was not arrested earlier. Perhaps if he had, lives might have been saved – such as the 51 Muslims who were shot dead in the Christchurch Mosque shootings whose perpetrator was abetted by Moon (archive). For that, I blame two people. Step forward, Randi Harper, enabler of the paedophile monster Joshua Conner Moon! In 2016 Joshua Moon was arrested by Pensacola police after his stalking email service lolcow.email was used to threaten murders at local schools. Randi helped pressure the sheriff into releasing him. She was publicly thanked by the Kiwis and the thread on her was locked in gratitude. She wrote an article about the support on Medium, claiming to be motivated by morality (archive). However, she was later accused of using the site to attack her enemies (archive). Nora Reed, a transwoman who accused Harper, described her as, “a fucking snake”.

Continue reading

Share Button

Solicitors Regulatory Authority – “Gathering Information” Over Alleged Gerald Shamash Letter to @Women4Wes

As a Conservative law blogger, I read left-wing Labour blog the Skwawkbox surprisingly often, usually in an attempt to convince Labour-backing family members that Keir Starmer is a bad man and they should consider that, “other” party. Earlier today, I happened to notice a story about a Twitter account called @Women4Wes and a letter the operator had allegedly received from solicitor Gerald Shamash from Edwards Duthie Shamash. The letter was so plainly deficient that I reported it to the SRA, since if he really wrote it, I felt it should be investigated as a conduct issue. The SRA have now confirmed they are gathering further information. At the same time, Edwards Duthie Shamash (EDS) have contacted me saying that the letter is a forgery, which I find to be a plausible explanation. Either way, someone is in trouble.

A letter allegedly from Gerald Shamash, solicitor, to a Twitter user. The letter opens by purporting to be an order.

A letter allegedly from Gerald Shamash, solicitor, to a Twitter user. The letter opens by purporting to be an order. Mr Shamash’s law firm, EDS, say it is forged and he did not write it.

This is a really bad solicitors letter. So bad, I was not certain that a real solicitor wrote it. The letter does not clearly identify a head of claim, although it refers to harassment and content which, “infringes” on their client’s character. It does not refer to a statute or to my mind comply with adequate clarity with the Practice Direction on Pre-action Conduct or any pre-action protocol. For example, I am not clear how a site called, @Women4Wes can be said to be pretending to be Wes Streeting. If I was writing this letter for myself or someone I was charitably assisting as a McKenzie Friend, I would comply fully with the Pre-action Protocol for Media and Communications claims. There would probably be a schedule of harassing tweets and also defamatory tweets.

However, the real flaw is in the opening five words, “This CEASE AND DESIST ORDER […]. I’m a gonna lay it out there. This letter is not a court order. Solicitors generally do not and cannot make, “cease and desist” orders. Judges do. Anyone with a reasonable familiarity with the legal system should know this and critically, a solicitor ought to know this is not appropriate. A legally ignorant, poorly educated, recipient might well confuse this with a court order such as a restraining order. It is on headed notepaper, apparently from a real firm of solicitors. It looks, “official”.

That is not to endorse the @Women4Wes account, which has to my mind made some very unwise posts. I did see, within moments of reading it, what I thought was an actionable post (albeit, not actionable by Mr Streeting). That is no excuse for this letter. If I was an aggrieved politician and I paid a solicitor to write a letter and they sent me this as a draft I would terminate the instruction on the spot citing a loss of confidence in their competence and then I would demand a full refund of the retainer.

I put the allegation to Gerald Shamash of Edwards Duthie Shamash and to his senior partner, Shaun Murphy, asking if they really wrote this letter. I received a letter from an associate denying it. I also put the allegation to the SRA press office. Taking my points, they confirm that they are looking into the matter. An SRA spokesperson said: “Now we aware of this, we will gather all relevant information before deciding on any next steps.”

Share Button

I Voted for Rishi Sunak

Today, MHN editor Sam Smith, having met both candidates, voted for Rishi Sunak in the Conservative Party leadership election. It was a decision on a narrow balance, and should not be seen as disparagement of the other side, but here are the reasons why.

MHN Editor met Rishi Sunak at an event organised by Grant Shapps MP, in the beautiful grounds of Brocket Hall in Hertfordshire. Picture shows Rishi speaking to party members.

MHN Editor met Rishi Sunak at an event organised by Grant Shapps MP, in the beautiful grounds of Brocket Hall in Hertfordshire. Picture shows Rishi speaking to party members.

Firstly, kudos to Welwyn-Hatfield MP and Secretary of State for Transport Grant Shapps. Thanks to him, local Conservative party members have had the chance to meet both candidates for leader – Liz Truss at the Christmas Party and, at a lunchtime event on Tuesday, Rishi Sunak. Sunak spoke to members in a room in beautiful Brocket Hall and afterwards spoke to members in the grounds. Kudos also to both candidates for meeting members.

The beautiful grounds of Brocket Hall in summer. Auberge-du-Lac restaurant is on the other side of the lake. Picture by MHN.

The beautiful grounds of Brocket Hall in summer. Auberge-du-Lac restaurant is on the other side of the lake. Picture by MHN.

Nonetheless, how to vote was a difficult decision because neither candidate shares my view – at least openly – on the issue most important to me. That issue is the Ukraine war and the linked cost-of-living crisis. My view is that our policy is wrong. Whilst Putin may well be a deplorable dictator, the Ukraine war and the consequent global energy, economic and cost-of-living crisis is the West’s fault.

Firstly, let us be clear. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy, who took power in 2019, is no heroic democrat. Forget Russian propaganda – readers need only look at what Amnesty International and the United Nations said about the Ukraine under his rule.

From the Amnesty International report on Ukraine 2021 (archive) –

Continue reading

Share Button